The Lake Norman Brief · Carolina history, Lake Norman & North Carolina law · from Adkins Law, PLLCOffice 704-274-5677  ·  Text 704-231-5762
LKN LawThe Lake Norman Brief

The Lake Norman Brief · from Adkins Law

History, the lake & the law.

Carolina and World War II history, Lake Norman stories, and practical North Carolina legal guidance.

Photo: Christopher Sheridan, CC BY-SA 4.0

Dee Dee Dawkins, Chapter 4: The file, the shoe and the long silence

Case file 06 · Chapter 4 of 6

The file, the shoe and the long silence

The sheriff and the SBI took over in August 1992. The one piece of physical evidence logged, a shoe, has not been seen in the records since August 12, 1992. By 2001 the SBI had closed the case.

Move your cursor or finger across the photograph

Photograph: The 1924 Catawba County Courthouse in Newton. William Keener · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

People in this chapter · J.D. Pitts · Glen Edward Chapman · Willie Armstrong

The first investigation at a glance

Lead agencies
Catawba County Sheriff’s Office and the N.C. State Bureau of Investigation, from early August 1992
Lead detective
J.D. Pitts of the sheriff’s office, one of the leads in 1992, now retired. He declined to comment to Dateline
Physical evidence
One shoe, the only item logged. No custody record after Aug. 12, 1992; not found in 2018 or 2024 audits
1996
A partial prosecution summary, which the district attorney says his office never received
2001
The SBI closed the case, according to WCNC as cited by Dateline
The file
Fewer than 20 pages, covering 1992 to 1996, provided to Dateline
Charges
No one has ever been charged in Dee Dee’s death

A county case

Within days of the discovery, the case left Brookford. The town’s police department was a single officer. Early in August 1992 the Catawba County Sheriff’s Office and the SBI took over. One of the lead detectives was J.D. Pitts of the sheriff’s office. He is retired and declined to comment when Dateline contacted him.

What those investigators did over the next four years is hard to reconstruct from the public record. When Dateline asked the sheriff’s office for the case file, it received fewer than 20 pages, covering records from 1992 to 1996. The office later said a complete file existed as of 2024. Hickory police, who took the missing person report, did not produce their file at all.

Sources: NBC News Dateline, Cold Case Spotlight

The 1924 Catawba County Courthouse in Newton
The 1924 Catawba County Courthouse in Newton, the county seat, where the sheriff’s office and the district attorney are based. William Keener · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

The shoe

Items logged from the scene: one shoe.

Turned over to: the Catawba County Sheriff’s Office, 1992.

Last recorded date in custody: August 12, 1992.

Evidence audits: 2018 and 2024. Not located.

Electronic evidence records begin: 2001.

A summary of facts reported by Dateline and WSOC, which credited the Hickory Daily Record. Not a transcription.

Dee Dee was found wearing one shoe. That shoe was the only physical evidence logged in the case, according to Dateline, and it is gone. The last date the records show it in custody is August 12, 1992. The sheriff’s office told reporters that audits of its evidence storage in 2018 and 2024 did not find it, and that no records show the shoe was ever entered into evidence. The loss went unnoticed until Brookford police reopened the case in 2023. The Hickory Daily Record first reported it, and WSOC followed in December 2025.

Why does a single shoe matter? Modern laboratories can sometimes develop DNA profiles from touch evidence, from fibers and from biological traces that 1992 science could not read. A shoe worn by a victim and handled by whoever moved her is the kind of item cold case units resubmit. Without it, investigators are left largely with testimony, and testimony fades.

Sources: NBC News Dateline, Cold Case Spotlight · WSOC, Dec. 30, 2025

1shoe logged as evidenceDateline
Aug. 12, 1992last date the shoe appears in custodyDateline
2evidence audits, 2018 and 2024, that did not find itWSOC
< 20pages in the file given to DatelineDateline

Other deaths that summer

Dee Dee’s death was not the only one in Hickory that summer. In August 1992, the bodies of two women, Tenene Yvette Conley and Betty Jean Ramseur, were found within a week of each other in abandoned houses in the city. A Hickory man, Glen Edward Chapman, was charged with both killings. In November 1994 a jury convicted him of two counts of first-degree murder, and he was sentenced to death.

Chapman was innocent. A Superior Court judge’s 186-page order in November 2007 found that the state had withheld evidence, including a credible confession by another person, and that Chapman’s trial lawyers had been ineffective. Evidence suggested Conley may have died of an overdose rather than murder. The district attorney dismissed the charges and Chapman walked out of prison on April 2, 2008, after nearly 15 years, most of them on death row. He later settled a civil rights suit for $1,025,000.

Dee Dee’s family told Dateline that police had linked Chapman to her death. He was never charged in it. The family did not learn of his exoneration until 2015. The Brief notes the history only because it explains a part of the family’s frustration: for years, they believed the case had an answer that, in the end, it did not have. Nothing in the public record connects Chapman to Dee Dee’s death, and he was cleared in the cases for which he was convicted.

Sources: National Registry of Exonerations: Glen Edward Chapman · Death Penalty Information Center: Chapman exoneration · NBC News Dateline, Cold Case Spotlight · Missing in the Carolinas podcast, March 13, 2026

Map of Catawba County, North Carolina, drawn by R. A. Yoder in 1886
Catawba County as R. A. Yoder mapped it in 1886. Newton has long been the county seat. R. A. Yoder · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain

1996 and 2001

In 1996, Detective Pitts wrote a partial prosecution summary. It sits in the file today. According to the district attorney’s office and the sheriff’s office, it was never shared with the district attorney. In 2001, according to WCNC as cited by Dateline, the SBI closed the case. Electronic evidence records begin that year.

Why the case was closed is not explained in any public record. Brookford’s police chief, who reopened it two decades later, told Dateline there was no accurate reason he could find for closing it.

“There’s no accurate reason to describe why the case was closed.”Brookford Police Chief Willie Armstrong to Dateline

Sources: NBC News Dateline, Cold Case Spotlight

What 1992 could not do

The early 1990s were the first years of forensic DNA in American courts. North Carolina’s DNA database was in its infancy, and profiles from small or degraded samples were often impossible. Cold case units now routinely revisit cases like this one, but they depend on evidence that was collected, logged and kept. In Dee Dee’s case, the public record shows little was collected and the one item logged was lost.

That leaves people. The sheriff’s office’s unsolved case page asks anyone with information to contact Senior Investigator Daniel Jenkins. The family believes someone in Hickory or Brookford has known for 34 years.

Sources: Catawba County Sheriff’s Office unsolved cases

Do you know what happened to Dee Dee?

Tell the people who can check it

Catawba County Sheriff’s Office: 828-465-8340 or 828-464-5241 · Senior Investigator Daniel Jenkins, djenkins@catawbacountync.gov
N.C. State Bureau of Investigation: 919-582-TIPS (8477) or 800-334-3000
Brookford Police Department: 828-358-2025
Family tip line: 828-383-4063 · justice4deedee@gmail.com

The state reward is up to $25,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction. Firsthand details, dates, names and original photographs are the most useful. This site does not collect tips.

Christopher Adkins

About the author

Christopher Adkins

Chris Adkins is a North Carolina attorney, certified mediator and former Charlotte-Mecklenburg police officer. He founded Adkins Law in Huntersville and writes The Lake Norman Brief’s history and true crime collections from court records, archives and primary sources.

This dossier summarizes public records and published reporting. Where sources disagree, the disagreement is shown rather than resolved by guesswork. No private person is accused of anything here, and the charges once brought against a police chief were dismissed. It is history and legal education, not legal advice. Corrections are welcome through the contact page.