The Lake Norman Brief · Carolina history, Lake Norman & North Carolina law · from Adkins Law, PLLCOffice 704-274-5677  ·  Text 704-231-5762

The Lake Norman Brief · from Adkins Law

History, the lake & the law.

Carolina and World War II history, Lake Norman stories, and practical North Carolina legal guidance.

Photo: Christopher Sheridan, CC BY-SA 4.0

Kasserine Pass FAQ: Questions and Answers About the Battle and the Tunisian Campaign

← The Kasserine Pass collection/World War II

Kasserine Pass · Tunisia, November 1942 – May 1943

Kasserine Pass: questions and answers84 answers, each tied to the record.

How the Americans came to Tunisia, what happened at Faïd and Sidi Bou Zid, who held the pass and why it broke, how Rommel was stopped at Thala and Djebel el Hamra, who the commanders were, what the Tigers and tank destroyers could do, what the SS did to Tunisia’s Jews, how the air war was won, which famous stories are myths, what the battle cost, what the Army learned, and how to visit the ground or trace a Kasserine veteran today. Every answer names its sources and links to the chapter that tells the story in full.

04:0014 February 1943: the German attack on Sidi Bou Zid begins
9 daysfrom Sidi Bou Zid to Rommel’s decision to withdraw, 14–22 February
6,000–7,000American casualties in the February battles, most of them missing
989German casualties in the whole offensive, by German records
2,841Americans buried at the North Africa American Cemetery, Carthage

Photograph: men of the 2nd Battalion, 16th Infantry, 1st Infantry Division, march through the Kasserine Pass toward Kasserine and Fériana on 26 February 1943, after the Axis withdrawal. U.S. Army Signal Corps photo SC 170121, U.S. National Archives (digitized by the Signal Corps Archive); public domain, via Wikimedia Commons. Toned for this page.

In this FAQ

All 84 questions, by topic

Choose a question to jump to its answer. Figures come from the U.S. Army’s official history by George F. Howe, the British official history, the Army Air Forces’ official history, the Army’s medical history, Martin Blumenson, Rick Atkinson and the other sources cited in each chapter; where they disagree, the answer says so and gives the range.

The numbers at a glance

Counting a defeat, and a campaign

Most figures for February 1943 come with a range, because units lost their records with their men and early counts of the missing included soldiers who walked back days later. Each chart says what it measures; do not add the bars together.

By the numbers

The February battles: casualties by nation

Killed, wounded and missing (including prisoners), 14–22 February 1943. Ranges show where the sources differ; British losses in men at Thala and Sbiba are not given in the sources used here.

United States (about 300 killed, 3,000 wounded, 3,000 missing)about 6,000–7,000
Germany (201 killed, 536 wounded, 252 missing)989
France (50 killed, 200 wounded, 250 missing)about 500
Italy: prisoners taken by the Alliesat least 535
Sources: Blumenson, “Kasserine Pass,” in America’s First Battles (1986), pp. 260–261; Encyclopaedia Britannica; Budiansky, HistoryNet; German records in Howe, Northwest Africa, ch. XXIV, n. 44. Bars are scaled to about 6,300. Italian casualties were not fully recorded. See Chapter 9.
By the numbers

The whole Tunisian campaign: Allied casualties

Killed, wounded and missing, November 1942 – 13 May 1943, by the British official history’s count. Allied total 76,020.

British and Commonwealth38,360
French19,439
United States18,221
… of whom killed2,715
… of whom missing, mostly captured6,528
Source: Playfair, The Mediterranean and Middle East, vol. IV, p. 460, as also used by Atkinson, An Army at Dawn, p. 536; the U.S. Army’s campaign brochure gives the same American figures. Bars are scaled to the British total. See Chapter 8 and Chapter 9.

Six dates, November 1942 – May 1943

From the landings to the surrender. Times and dates are as the records give them.

  1. TorchAmericans and British land in Morocco and Algeria; the Germans fly into Tunis the next day.
  2. FaïdThe 21st Panzer Division takes Faïd Pass from the French; American counterattacks fail.
  3. Sidi Bou ZidFrühlingswind destroys Combat Command A; the 168th Infantry is cut off on the hills.
  4. The passStark Force holds for a day and a half; the pass falls on the evening of 20 February.
  5. Thala and HamraRommel is stopped on both roads; on the 22nd he and Kesselring decide to withdraw.
  6. SurrenderThe last Axis forces in Africa surrender; about a quarter of a million prisoners.
Sources: Howe, Northwest Africa; Playfair, vol. IV. See the full timeline and the atlas on the collection page.
On the map

From the Eastern Dorsal to the pass, and the war around it

Use the phase buttons on the first map to follow the February battles from Sidi Bou Zid through the retreat to the fight in the passes and the withdrawal. The second shows the pass itself; the third the whole Mediterranean campaign from the Torch landings to May 1943.

Central Tunisia and eastern Algeria, with the Eastern and Western Dorsals, the roads and the railway. The phase buttons step from January through the loss of Faïd (30 January–13 February), Sidi Bou Zid (14–15 February), the retreat through Sbeitla, Gafsa, Fériana and Thelepte (16–18 February), the pass (19–20 February), Thala, Djebel el Hamra and the withdrawal (21–23 February) and the spring offensive (March–May 1943). Arrows and positions are approximate, after Howe’s maps in Northwest Africa.
The pass between Djebel Chambi and Djebel Semmama, the Oued Hatab, the road fork toward Thala and Tébessa, and the positions of the 19th Engineers and the 1st Battalion, 26th Infantry. Unit markers are schematic and positions approximate, after Howe.
The Torch landings at Casablanca, Oran and Algiers, the Axis airlift from Sicily into Tunis, the race for Tunis, Rommel’s retreat from Libya to the Mareth Line and the end in May 1943. Positions are approximate, after Howe and Playfair.
Questions and answers

84 questions about Kasserine Pass and the Tunisian campaign

Open a question to read the answer. Each one names its sources and links to the chapter where the story is told in full.

01

The basics

What the battle was, when and where it was fought, and who won

The basicsWhat was the Battle of Kasserine Pass?

The Battle of Kasserine Pass was the German and Italian offensive against the U.S. II Corps and its British and French allies in central Tunisia in February 1943, and the U.S. Army’s first large battle against the German army. In the broad sense historians use the name for the whole series of Axis attacks from 14 to 22 February: Operation Frühlingswind at Sidi Bou Zid (14–17 February), Rommel’s Operation Morgenluft through Gafsa, Fériana and Thelepte, the American retreat to the Western Dorsal, the fight for the pass itself on 19–20 February, and the battles at Thala, Djebel el Hamra and Sbiba that stopped the offensive on 19–22 February. In the narrow sense it is the two-day defense of the gap northwest of Kasserine village by a scratch force built around the 19th Engineer Combat Regiment (Howe; Blumenson). It ended with the Axis back through the pass on 23 February and the Allies in it again by 25 February.

Sources: Howe, Northwest Africa (1957), chs. XXI–XXIV; Blumenson, Kasserine Pass (1967) and America’s First Battles (1986)

Read more: Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid · Chapter 5: The Pass · Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra · The collection

The basicsWhen did it begin and end?

The opening blow came at about 04:00 on 14 February 1943, when the 10th and 21st Panzer Divisions moved through Faïd and Maïzila passes toward Sidi Bou Zid (Watson; Howe). The fighting in the pass began at daybreak on 19 February, and the pass fell in the late afternoon and evening of 20 February. Rommel’s thrusts beyond it were stopped on 21–22 February; on the afternoon of the 22nd he and Kesselring agreed to withdraw, and the Comando Supremo ordered the retirement shortly before midnight. The Axis forces were back through the pass on 23 February, and Allied troops found it free of the enemy at about 10:00 on 25 February (Howe). Blumenson’s essay frames the battle more widely, from the loss of Faïd Pass on 30 January to 22 February. The Tunisian campaign as a whole ran from 17 November 1942 to the Axis surrender on 13 May 1943 (CMH).

Sources: Howe, chs. XXI–XXIV; Watson, Exit Rommel (2007); Blumenson (1986); CMH, Tunisia (1993)

Read more: Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal · Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid · Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra · Timeline

The basicsWhere is the Kasserine Pass?

In west-central Tunisia, a few miles northwest of the city of Kasserine (ancient Cillium). It is a gap in the Western, or Grand, Dorsal, the mountain chain that runs southwest across central Tunisia toward the Algerian border. The Oued Hatab flows through it between Djebel Chambi, at 1,544 m the highest mountain in Tunisia, on the south, and Djebel Semmama, 1,356 m, on the north. Seen from the air, Howe wrote, the pass is “shaped like a crude capital X.” Its floor lies at about 2,000 feet, with crests about 2,000 feet higher; at its narrowest the defile is about a mile wide by Howe’s description, while a visitor’s account of 2010 gives about 800 yards. Beyond the narrows, at the hamlet of Bordj Chambi, the road forks: north to Thala and Le Kef, and west across the Bahiret Foussana basin to Tébessa in Algeria (Howe; Armchair General).

Sources: Howe, ch. XXIII; Armchair General (2010)

Read more: Chapter 5: The Pass · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory · Atlas

The basicsWho fought there?

On the Allied side: the U.S. II Corps under Maj. Gen. Lloyd R. Fredendall, with the 1st Armored Division, parts of the 1st, 9th and 34th Infantry Divisions, the 19th Engineer Combat Regiment, tank destroyer and artillery battalions and the XII Air Support Command; the British First Army of Lt. Gen. Kenneth Anderson, which coordinated the whole front, with the 26th Armoured Brigade, the 1st Guards Brigade and the 2/5th Leicesters; and the French XIX Corps. On the Axis side: Generaloberst Hans-Jürgen von Arnim’s Fifth Panzer Army, whose 10th and 21st Panzer Divisions and Tigers of the 501st Heavy Panzer Battalion struck at Sidi Bou Zid, and Field Marshal Erwin Rommel’s German-Italian Panzer Army, which sent the Afrika Korps assault group, Kampfgruppe DAK, and troops of the Italian Centauro Armored Division. Field Marshal Albert Kesselring and the Italian Comando Supremo stood over both (Howe; Playfair).

Sources: Howe, chs. XX–XXIV; Playfair, The Mediterranean and Middle East, vol. IV (1966)

Read more: Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal · Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid · Chapter 4: The Long Retreat · Chapter 5: The Pass · Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra

The basicsWho won, and why does it matter?

The Axis won the first week decisively and lost the end. From 14 to 20 February the Germans destroyed Combat Command A of the 1st Armored Division, took thousands of prisoners, drove II Corps back some 40 to 50 miles and broke through the pass. On 21–22 February they were stopped at Thala, Djebel el Hamra and Sbiba short of every objective, and they withdrew. Howe’s balance sheet concludes that the Allies were soon back on the ground they had lost, their capacity to attack “not significantly impaired.” For Americans the battle mattered as the first large meeting between the U.S. Army and the German army, and as a defeat of organization and command that the Army studied hard. Its lessons, about keeping divisions together, massing artillery and working with the air forces, were carried to El Guettar, Sicily and Normandy (Howe; Blumenson).

Sources: Howe, ch. XXIV (“Balance Sheet of the February Battles”) and ch. XXXV; Blumenson (1986)

Read more: Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra · Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

02

Torch and the road to Tunisia

How the Americans came to North Africa and why the war went on into 1943

By the numbers

Axis troops shipped to Tunisia, by month

German and Italian soldiers delivered by air and sea. From February the figures count Germans only; the number of Italians is unknown.

Nov 194228,187
Dec 194237,757
Jan 194341,115
Feb 1943 (German)29,233
Mar 1943 (German)20,135
Apr 1943 (German)11,142
May 1943 (German)315
Source: Howe, Northwest Africa, appendix B, table 11, from German army transport records: 167,884 in all, of whom 137,149 German. See Chapter 1.
Torch and the road to TunisiaWhat was Operation Torch, and why North Africa instead of France?

Torch was the Anglo-American invasion of French Morocco and Algeria on 8 November 1942, by three task forces landing around Casablanca, Oran and Algiers: about 125,000 soldiers, sailors and airmen in all, 82,600 of them U.S. Army (CMH). Gen. George C. Marshall and the Army’s planners wanted to invade France. The British would not agree to a landing there in 1942, and Roosevelt insisted that American ground troops fight Germans somewhere that year. On 14 July 1942 he rejected the Marshall–King “Pacific alternative,” on 24–25 July the Combined Chiefs agreed on North Africa, and the decision was final by 30 July (Howe, ch. II; FDR Library). The fighting against the Vichy French on 8–11 November killed 526 U.S. Army soldiers. Most historians judge that North Africa gave the Army experience it needed before France, at a price paid at Tebourba, Sidi Bou Zid and Kasserine.

Sources: Howe, ch. II; CMH, Algeria-French Morocco; FDR Library, “Roosevelt, Commander in Chief” (2022)

Read more: Chapter 1: Torch and the Race for Tunis

Torch and the road to TunisiaWhat was the Darlan deal?

Admiral François Darlan, commander in chief of Vichy France’s armed forces, happened to be in Algiers on 8 November 1942 visiting his son, who was gravely ill with polio. French officers would not follow Gen. Henri Giraud, the Americans’ candidate, because their oath was to Marshal Pétain and Darlan was Pétain’s designated heir. Shortly before noon on 10 November Darlan ordered all French forces in North Africa to stop fighting, and on 13 November Maj. Gen. Mark Clark and the diplomat Robert Murphy agreed that he would be High Commissioner of French North Africa, with Giraud commanding the French forces; Eisenhower approved it the same day (Howe, ch. XIV). It ended the fighting and brought an army of more than 100,000 men to the Allied side. But Darlan had collaborated with Germany since 1940, Vichy’s anti-Jewish laws stayed in force for months, and the deal caused an uproar in Britain and America. Roosevelt called it a temporary expedient. Darlan was assassinated in Algiers on 24 December 1942.

Sources: Howe, ch. XIV and ch. XVIII; CMH, Algeria-French Morocco

Read more: Chapter 1: Torch and the Race for Tunis

Torch and the road to TunisiaWhy did the Allies lose the race for Tunis?

Distance, weather and the enemy’s speed. German aircraft began landing at El Aouina, the airfield of Tunis, on 9 November, the day after Torch, and Vichy’s officials in Tunisia did not resist. About 28,000 Axis troops reached Tunisia in November and almost 38,000 more in December (Howe, app. B). The nearest Allied landing was at Algiers, about 500 miles away, and the drive east was made by about two British brigade groups, Blade Force and part of the U.S. 1st Armored Division’s Combat Command B, supplied over one railway and poor roads and covered by aircraft flying from distant, muddy fields. The Allies came within 13 miles of Tunis at Djedeida on 28–29 November, were thrown back at Tebourba on 1–4 December and were driven off Longstop Hill on Christmas Day. On 24 December Eisenhower postponed the offensive until the winter rains ended (Howe, chs. XV–XVIII).

Sources: Howe, chs. XIV–XVIII and appendix B; Craven and Cate, vol. 2, ch. 3

Read more: Chapter 1: Torch and the Race for Tunis · Chapter 7: The Air War

Torch and the road to TunisiaWas Kasserine the Americans’ first battle against the Germans?

No, though it is often described that way. American soldiers had fought German troops in Tunisia since November 1942: beside the French at Medjez el Bab on 19 November; in the raid on Djedeida airfield on 25 November; at the Chouïgui pass on 26 November, where Lt. Col. John K. Waters’s light tanks fought what the official history calls the first battle between American and German armor in the war; at Tebourba, on the Medjerda and on Longstop Hill in December; and along the Eastern Dorsal at Ousseltia, Faïd and Sened in January and early February 1943 (Howe). About fifty Rangers had gone on the Dieppe raid of August 1942. Some of the units broken in February had been in action for three months. What was new at Kasserine was the scale of the German attack, the presence of Rommel and the size of the defeat.

Sources: Howe, chs. XV–XVII and XX; King, Rangers (1985)

Read more: Chapter 1: Torch and the Race for Tunis · Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal

Torch and the road to TunisiaWhy was II Corps strung out along the Eastern Dorsal in February?

Because the Allied front had grown up by improvisation. After the December stalemate the line ran from the coast west of Bizerte to the desert near Gafsa, with the British First Army in the north, the poorly armed French XIX Corps in the mountains of the center and the U.S. II Corps assembling in the south around Tébessa. No one commanded all three until Eisenhower gave Anderson coordination of the front on 21 January and attached II Corps to First Army on 24 January (Howe). An American offensive toward Sfax, Operation SATIN, was cancelled in mid-January. The German EILBOTE attacks broke the French from 18 January, the 21st Panzer Division took Faïd Pass on 30–31 January, and American counterattacks at Faïd, Maïzila and Sened failed. By 13 February the 1st Armored Division was spread over more than fifty miles in four separated combat commands, one of them far to the north (Howe).

Sources: Howe, chs. XVIII–XXI

Read more: Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal

03

Faïd, Sidi Bou Zid and the retreat

The loss of the Eastern Dorsal, the destruction of Combat Command A and the fall back to Kasserine, 30 January–18 February

The myth

At Sidi Bou Zid the green Americans of the 1st Armored Division ran into Rommel’s Afrika Korps and its Tiger tanks, which they could not touch.

The record

Rommel did not command at Sidi Bou Zid: Operation Frühlingswind belonged to von Arnim’s Fifth Panzer Army and was directed by Ziegler, and the 10th Panzer Division had never served with the Afrika Korps. Only 11 or 12 Tigers took part by Howe’s count, perhaps six by a German unit study. Most American losses came from Panzer IVs, antitank guns, 88s and dive bombers, and from a plan that left units isolated on open ground (Howe; Chapter 3).

By the numbers

American tanks lost at Sidi Bou Zid, 14–15 February 1943

American figures first, then German claims (lighter bars). Bars are scaled to the largest value.

Combat Command A, 14 Feb (Howe)44
Combat Command C, 15 Feb (Watson)46
1st Armored Division, two days (Newton)98
German claim, 14 Feb40
German claim, 15 Feb39
21st Panzer claim, 14–17 Feb103
Sources: Howe, chs. XXI–XXII; Watson, Exit Rommel (2007), p. 77; Newton, World War II magazine (2002). Of Alger’s battalion only four tanks came back on 15 February. The 21st Panzer claim includes Sbeitla on 16–17 February. See Chapter 3.
Faïd, Sidi Bou Zid and the retreatWhat happened at Faïd Pass on 30–31 January 1943?

Early on 30 January the 21st Panzer Division under Col. Hans-Georg Hildebrandt attacked the French garrison of Faïd and Aïn Rebaou, about 1,000 men of Gen. Joseph Welvert’s Constantine Division under Brig. Gen. Schwartz, whose old 75 mm guns fired over open sights (Howe; Rickard). Orders for Combat Command A to counterattack reached the 1st Armored Division at about 09:30, but at 14:30 Brig. Gen. Raymond McQuillin postponed the attack to the next morning, with German aircraft over every move and his units thirty miles from their start lines. The French held through the night. The American attack at 07:00 on 31 January ran into well-sited antitank guns that destroyed at least eight tanks of Company H, 1st Armored Regiment, and by 14:00 the Germans held the pass; a second attempt on 1 February also failed. By 2 February the French reported 905 killed or missing, and the Germans claimed 1,047 prisoners (Howe). Faïd became the door for the attack of 14 February.

Sources: Howe, ch. XX; J. Rickard, historyofwar.org (2017)

Read more: Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal

Faïd, Sidi Bou Zid and the retreatWhat happened at Sidi Bou Zid on 14 February 1943?

At about 04:00 on 14 February, St. Valentine’s Day, Operation Frühlingswind began. The 10th Panzer Division came through Faïd Pass, one group swinging around Djebel Lessouda to cut the road behind it and another driving straight at Sidi Bou Zid, while the 21st Panzer Division came through Maïzila Pass and hooked round by Bir el Hafey. At about 06:30 panzers destroyed Maj. Norman Parsons’s patrol at the mouth of the pass, cutting the radio link to Lt. Col. John K. Waters on Lessouda. Lt. Col. Louis V. Hightower’s tank battalion, the mobile reserve, was outranged near the Poste de Lessouda, and dive bombers destroyed the 2nd Battalion, 17th Field Artillery, on the move. At 17:05 the German pincers met west of the village (Howe). Combat Command A lost 44 tanks and most of its artillery and fell back to Djebel Hamra, leaving two battalions of the 168th Infantry surrounded on the hills.

Sources: Howe, ch. XXI; Watson (2007); Newton, World War II magazine (2002)

Read more: Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid

Faïd, Sidi Bou Zid and the retreatWhy were American infantry left on isolated hills?

Because the defense was laid out from the map. Fredendall’s directive of 11 February, carried to the 1st Armored Division by Maj. Warren Hugulet, named Djebel Ksaira and Djebel Lessouda “the key terrain features in the defense of FAÏD”: a battalion on each, with a mobile reserve near Sidi Bou Zid (Howe). The hills were steep and commanded the plain, but they were several miles apart, too far for their garrisons to support one another or for the reserve to reach them quickly against two panzer divisions. Once bypassed, the infantry could neither stop the armor nor get away across open ground in daylight. A corps commander was fixing battalion positions on ground he had not walked, in a division whose commander had been given the responsibility but not the choice. The garrisons were mostly Iowa National Guardsmen of the 168th Infantry, 34th “Red Bull” Division (Howe; Blumenson; Watson).

Sources: Howe, chs. XX–XXI; Blumenson (1967); Watson (2007)

Read more: Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal · Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid

Faïd, Sidi Bou Zid and the retreatWhat was Alger’s counterattack of 15 February?

It was the attempt to restore the position at Sidi Bou Zid on the afternoon of 15 February by Combat Command C under Col. Robert I. Stack, led by Lt. Col. James D. Alger’s 2nd Battalion, 1st Armored Regiment, a tank battalion in its first battle. It started at about 12:40 across roughly ten miles of open plain, in daylight and under air attack, against an enemy that division intelligence put at about 40 tanks; there were well over 100. Between about 16:30 and 17:40 German armor closed from north and south. Alger’s tank was knocked out near Sidi Salem and he was captured. “Only four emerged that evening,” Howe wrote of the battalion’s tanks, and it reported 15 officers and 298 men missing. A later study counts Combat Command C’s losses at 46 medium tanks, 130 vehicles and nine self-propelled guns (Howe; Watson; Newton).

Sources: Howe, ch. XXI; Watson (2007), p. 77; Newton (2002)

Read more: Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid

Faïd, Sidi Bou Zid and the retreatWhat happened to the 168th Infantry on the hills?

The battalions were ordered to hold and then ordered out too late. The 2nd Battalion on Djebel Lessouda broke out on the night of 15–16 February: 231 men reached Djebel Hamra by dawn and 61 were captured at once, while an Iowa account puts the total who reached American lines at 420 of more than 900 (Howe; Iowa PBS). Col. Thomas D. Drake’s headquarters and 3rd Battalion on Djebel Ksaira and Garet Hadid held through the 16th, destroyed their heavy weapons and set out on foot that night toward Djebel Hamra, about 15 miles away. At dawn on 17 February German motorized troops caught them on the open plain; about 800 men of one group and about 600 of the other, “including Colonel Drake,” were captured (Howe). Red Oak, Iowa, received more than 100 missing-in-action telegrams, and 45 of its men were captured or killed in the Kasserine battles (Atkinson).

Sources: Howe, chs. XXI–XXII; Iowa PBS, “Elvin Moritz”; Atkinson, An Army at Dawn (2002), p. 397

Read more: Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

Faïd, Sidi Bou Zid and the retreatDid the defenders of Sbeitla panic and run?

Partly, and only for a night. After German fire fell among supply dumps near Combat Command A’s command post at dusk on 16 February, rear-echelon vehicles and shaken survivors poured west through Sbeitla in what Howe called a “dense mass of churning traffic.” But the combat units held their positions. Anderson authorized withdrawal at about 01:30 on 17 February; the town was held until evening, well past the 11:00 deadline of one division order, and Brig. Gen. Paul Robinett’s Combat Command B beat off the 21st Panzer Division southeast of the town, its hidden tanks under Lt. Col. Henry E. Gardiner knocking out five or more German tanks at about 13:15. Gardiner’s battalion was last off the field, between 17:30 and 19:00, and the Germans entered Sbeitla after 17:00. Howe judged the withdrawal “orderly and effective” (Howe, ch. XXII).

Sources: Howe, ch. XXII; 443rd AAA Battalion history

Read more: Chapter 4: The Long Retreat

Faïd, Sidi Bou Zid and the retreatWhy were Gafsa, Fériana and Thelepte given up?

Because II Corps could not hold the basin after Sidi Bou Zid. The Allied commanders had already decided that Gafsa could not be held against a serious attack; First Army ordered it evacuated on 14 February, and the garrison left that night, the 1st Ranger Battalion last out. Rommel’s Kampfgruppe DAK entered the empty town on the evening of 15 February (Howe). The same day Anderson proposed a withdrawal to the Western Dorsal, and Eisenhower approved. Fériana and the Thelepte airfields were left on 17 February: the XII Air Support Command flew out 124 operational aircraft, the last mission leaving at 10:30, and poured out 60,000 gallons of aviation gasoline. Aircraft that could not fly were destroyed, eighteen burned by the air force history’s count or 34 demolished by an engineer officer’s report cited by Howe (Craven and Cate; Howe). By the evening of 18 February II Corps stood on the Western Dorsal.

Sources: Howe, chs. XXI–XXII and n. 35; Craven and Cate, vol. 2, ch. 5

Read more: Chapter 4: The Long Retreat · Chapter 7: The Air War

04

The pass and the 19th Engineers

The defense of the Kasserine Pass by Stark Force, 16–20 February 1943

By the numbers

Reported losses of three American units in the pass

Killed, wounded and missing combined, as reported by the units themselves.

3d Bn, 39th Infantry (11 killed, 30 wounded, 136 missing)177
1st Bn, 26th Infantry (6 killed, 35 wounded, 119 missing)160
19th Engineers (11 killed, 28 wounded, 89 missing)128
Source: Howe, ch. XXIV, n. 45, from the units’ records. The 39th Infantry figures include its fighting with Combat Command B after it left the pass. See Chapter 5.
The pass and the 19th EngineersWho defended the Kasserine Pass?

A provisional command called Stark Force. Its core was the 19th Engineer Combat Regiment (reinforced, less one company) under Col. Anderson T. W. Moore, which held the southwestern side of the gap from the Oued Hatab to Djebel Zebbeus across the Tébessa road, and the 1st Battalion, 26th Infantry, under Lt. Col. Gerald C. Kelleher, astride the Thala road on the northern side. Moore’s first line held about 2,000 men, supported by two batteries of 105 mm howitzers of the 33d Field Artillery Battalion, a French battery of 75s, the 805th Tank Destroyer Battalion and Company I, 13th Armored Regiment. During the battle came the 3d Battalion, 39th Infantry, the 26th Infantry’s regimental band as riflemen, the 3d Battalion, 6th Armored Infantry, the 894th Tank Destroyer Battalion and the British Gore Force. Col. Alexander N. Stark Jr. of the 26th Infantry commanded the whole from early on 19 February (Howe, chs. XXII–XXIII).

Sources: Howe, chs. XXII–XXIII, from the 26th Infantry and 19th Engineer reports

Read more: Chapter 5: The Pass

The pass and the 19th EngineersWere the 19th Engineers really road builders?

In the sense that matters, yes. The 19th Engineer Combat Regiment was a II Corps engineer regiment that landed in Algeria with Torch and spent the winter keeping the corps’ roads and airfields open, building bridges and clearing mines across the mountains from Tébessa (University of Utah profile; Bedingfield). One of its companies spent about three weeks tunneling shelters at Fredendall’s headquarters. It was not a labor battalion: combat engineers were armed and trained to fight, and the Army’s field manual said that in emergencies they might defend as infantry (FM 100-5, 1941, par. 639). But it had been employed in Tunisia as builders, many of its men had little infantry training, and it laid its mines and took its positions at night, in rain, on ground most of them had never seen by daylight (Howe). That contrast is why it is remembered as the road builders who held Kasserine.

Sources: Howe, chs. XXII–XXIII; FM 100-5 (1941); University of Utah honoree profile; Bedingfield, Baseball’s Greatest Sacrifice

Read more: Chapter 5: The Pass · Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal

The pass and the 19th EngineersDid Fredendall really tell Stark to “pull a Stonewall Jackson”?

As far as the record shows, yes. At 20:00 on 18 February Fredendall telephoned Col. Alexander N. Stark Jr. of the 26th Infantry at El Ma el Abiod, south of Tébessa. By the regiment’s after-action report, quoted in the official history, he said: “I want you to go to Kasserine right away and pull a Stonewall Jackson. Take over up there” (Howe, ch. XXIII). The allusion was to Thomas J. Jackson’s stand on Henry House Hill at First Manassas in July 1861. Stark drove through the night and took command before morning; it was formally recorded at 07:30 on 19 February. The words are a recollection of a telephone call written down within weeks by the regiment that received it, not a transcript. The order was typical of Fredendall’s style: vivid, and silent on what forces Stark would have or how his command related to Moore’s.

Sources: Howe, ch. XXIII, from the 26th Infantry after-action report, 19–24 February 1943

Read more: Chapter 5: The Pass · Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal

The pass and the 19th EngineersHow did the fight in the pass unfold on 19 February?

Rommel hoped to rush the pass at daybreak with the 33d Reconnaissance Battalion, at about 06:30 by one account; it was stopped in the center of the pass. Kampfgruppe DAK under Generalmajor Karl Bülowius then attacked on both sides of the river with Col. Otto Menton’s Panzer Grenadier Regiment Afrika and took Hill 974 on Djebel Semmama; low cloud denied the Germans their usual air support. At 10:15 the Americans saw 35 to 40 truckloads of German infantry unloading, and about noon Rommel and Bülowius were watching from the entrance. At 15:30 German tanks and infantry attacked along the Tébessa road into the engineers’ minefield, where five German tanks were knocked out under machine-gun, antitank and artillery fire (Howe). The Germans broke off at dusk with about 100 prisoners. The pass had held, but after dark a German detachment reached Hill 1191, the height that overlooks the whole floor of the pass.

Sources: Howe, ch. XXIII; mikesresearch.com (06:30 start)

Read more: Chapter 5: The Pass

The pass and the 19th EngineersWhy did the defense break on 20 February?

Mainly because the Germans took the high ground. The heights of Djebel Semmama were held by a few companies and patrols and were lost on the night of 19–20 February, when Company A, 26th Infantry, was cut off. At 08:30 on the 20th Bülowius attacked with both battalions of Panzer Grenadier Regiment Afrika, his 88s and a battery of new rocket projectors, with Italian Bersaglieri attacking on the Chambi side. Just before noon a German column broke in between two of Moore’s companies, tanks and infantry got through the minefield on the Tébessa road, and by noon Moore’s command post had been overrun (Howe). Radio contact between the tanks, the tank destroyers and Stark’s headquarters had broken down, there was no reserve, and the river split the position. At 16:30 a coordinated attack under five battalions of artillery cleared the pass. The defense crumbled, Howe concluded, but it “still seemed strong to the enemy.”

Sources: Howe, ch. XXIII; Playfair, vol. IV, p. 297

Read more: Chapter 5: The Pass

The pass and the 19th EngineersWhat went wrong with the minefields?

The plan was right and the execution was not. Moore planned a “triple belt of mines across the roads,” which met the three-row rule of the 1941 field manual (Howe; FM 100-5, par. 688). But the fields were laid at night, partly by infantrymen who had never laid a mine, on ground no one had seen in daylight. One engineer lieutenant, ordered at about 19:30 on 18 February to lay a field in front of the 26th Infantry, was not joined by his infantry detail until about 03:30, and to finish before dawn the men “merely strewed the mines unburied across a gap about 100 yards wide” (Howe, from Lt. Edwin C. Dryden’s memorandum of 20 May 1943). Where the mines on the Tébessa road were covered by fire on 19 February, they stopped the German tanks. On 20 February the troops covering them were driven off, and the Germans got through. The manual’s rule is that an obstacle must be covered by fire.

Sources: Howe, ch. XXIII and n. 21; FM 100-5 (1941), pars. 636 and 688

Read more: Chapter 5: The Pass · Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

The pass and the 19th EngineersWhat was Gore Force?

It was the small British detachment that First Army let Brig. Charles Dunphie send from Thala into the pass: eleven tanks (seven Valentines and four Crusaders of C Squadron, 2nd Lothians and Border Horse, by one account), a motor company of the 10th Battalion, The Rifle Brigade, a battery of 25-pounders and some antitank guns, under Lt. Col. Adrian C. Gore. Dunphie had recommended committing his whole 26th Armoured Brigade on the evening of 19 February; Brig. McNabb, Anderson’s chief of staff, refused, wanting the brigade free for Sbiba (Howe). Gore Force left at about 04:00 on 20 February and stood on the Thala side of the pass with the remaining Americans. Its resistance forced the Germans to commit their tank battalion, and, Howe wrote, “the British fought until their last tank was destroyed.” It withdrew at dusk with five American tank destroyers, buying time for the line south of Thala.

Sources: Howe, ch. XXIII; Playfair, vol. IV; Hastings, The Rifle Brigade in the Second World War (1950)

Read more: Chapter 5: The Pass · Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra

05

Thala and Djebel el Hamra

Where Rommel was stopped, 21–22 February, and why he went back

By the numbers

The guns behind Thala, 22 February 1943

Howitzers and field guns supporting the defense of Thala, by type.

U.S. 9th Division Artillery, all howitzers48
U.S. 105 mm (60th and 84th FA Bns)24
U.S. 155 mm (34th FA Bn)12
U.S. 75 mm (cannon companies)12
British guns at Thala36
Sources: Howe, ch. XXIV (U.S. guns by battalion); Watson (2007), p. 104, and Playfair, vol. IV, p. 300, as cited (British guns). Together, about 84 guns. See Chapter 6.
Thala and Djebel el HamraHow was Rommel stopped at Thala?

By an Allied defense in two stages. On 21 February, from about 09:30, the 10th Panzer Division’s battle group under von Broich, about 30 tanks, 20 self-propelled guns and 35 half-tracks, advanced up the Thala road. Brig. Charles Dunphie’s 26th Armoured Brigade, outgunned, gave ground ridge by ridge, losing fifteen tanks on one ridge by about 16:00, and fell back through the 2/5th Leicesters on the last ridge before the town. At about 19:00 a German column led by a captured Valentine broke into the Leicesters’ position. After about three hours of fighting in the dark the attack was stopped two or three miles short of Thala, and the Germans took about 700 prisoners (Howe). That night the U.S. 9th Infantry Division Artillery went into position behind the town. On 22 February its fire, with the British guns and a British tank attack before dawn, persuaded von Broich to stay on the defensive (Howe; Zaloga).

Sources: Howe, ch. XXIV; Zaloga, Kasserine Pass 1943 (2005)

Read more: Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra

Thala and Djebel el HamraHow far did the 9th Division Artillery march to Thala?

Brig. Gen. S. LeRoy Irwin’s 9th Infantry Division Artillery was near Tlemcen in western Algeria when it was ordered to Tébessa on the morning of 17 February. It was on the road that afternoon: 2,170 officers and men in 411 vehicles, a column about eleven miles long, led by Lt. Col. William C. Westmoreland’s 34th Field Artillery Battalion, with the 60th and 84th Field Artillery Battalions and the cannon companies of the 47th and 60th Infantry. It reached Tébessa on the morning of 21 February, was sent north to Thala, and went into position that afternoon and night with 48 howitzers: twelve 155 mm, twenty-four 105 mm and twelve 75 mm (Howe; 9th Infantry Division Association). Howe gives “over 800 miles” in four days; one division history gives 735 miles in 100 hours, probably counting only to Tébessa. By the division’s count it fired 1,904 rounds and lost 45 men, eight of them killed.

Sources: Howe, ch. XXIV; 9th Infantry Division Association, “The Battle at Thala” and “Tunisia”

Read more: Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra

Thala and Djebel el HamraDid American artillery alone save Thala?

No. On 21 February the defense of Thala was British, and Howe says that American units played no significant part that day: the 26th Armoured Brigade and the 2/5th Leicesters stopped the German attack a few miles short of the town at heavy cost. On 22 February the 9th Division Artillery, firing alongside about 36 British guns, more than eighty tubes in all, made the decisive contribution (Howe; Watson; Playfair). It did not destroy many tanks; Battery C of the 84th Field Artillery, firing over open sights, knocked out two Panzer IVs and lost two of its four howitzers. What the massed fire did, together with the British pre-dawn tank attack, was to convince von Broich and Rommel that the defense had been heavily reinforced, which by then was true. Thala was held by an Allied defense, not by either army alone.

Sources: Howe, ch. XXIV; Watson (2007), p. 104; Playfair, vol. IV, p. 300; 9th Infantry Division Association

Read more: Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra

Thala and Djebel el HamraWhat happened at Djebel el Hamra?

While the British fought for Thala, the Americans held the road to Tébessa. Robinett’s Combat Command B, with Gardiner’s tanks dug in along the ridge of Djebel el Hamra, and the 16th Infantry of Maj. Gen. Terry Allen’s 1st Infantry Division waited on good ground with massed artillery. Kampfgruppe DAK left Kasserine at 14:00 on 21 February, was stopped after about an hour of long-range fire, and pulled back at about 18:00. A night march by Panzer Grenadier Regiment Afrika around the American left lost its way in rain and fog. At daylight on 22 February it overran Battery C, 33rd Field Artillery, and took Hill 812 near Bou Chebka, then stuck there under artillery fire. At 16:00 the 3rd Battalion, 16th Infantry, with tanks of the 13th Armored Regiment, retook the hill and recovered eight American guns; more than 400 prisoners were taken (Howe; Kelly). The Germans got no closer than about 23 miles from Tébessa.

Sources: Howe, ch. XXIV; Kelly, Meeting the Fox (2002), p. 244; Phifer, Warfare History Network

Read more: Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra

Thala and Djebel el HamraWhat happened at Sbiba?

Sbiba was the third road, toward Le Kef, and the first to be blocked. On 19 February the 21st Panzer Division moved north from Sbeitla at 09:00 and shortly before noon ran into a belt of mines about six miles southeast of Sbiba, covered by artillery and held by the British 1st Guards Brigade, the U.S. 18th Combat Team and the 133rd and 135th Infantry of the U.S. 34th Division, with three American artillery battalions. American guns, the 151st Field Artillery Battalion among them, fired more than 100 concentrations on the German tanks, and Hildebrandt lost ten to twelve tanks that day. A second attack on 20 February was also stopped (Howe, chs. XXIII–XXIV). The repulse at Sbiba is what made Rommel switch his main effort to the Kasserine Pass on the night of 19–20 February. The one battle monument in the area commemorates the Kasserine Pass and the Sbiba Gap together.

Sources: Howe, chs. XXIII–XXIV; Armchair General (2010)

Read more: Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra · Chapter 5: The Pass

Thala and Djebel el HamraWhy did Rommel call off the offensive?

Because he had been stopped on all three roads. On the afternoon of 22 February Kesselring came to Rommel’s command post northwest of the pass, and the two field marshals agreed to withdraw from west-central Tunisia and to shift the mobile forces south against the British Eighth Army at Mareth; the Comando Supremo issued the order shortly before midnight (Howe). Rommel’s recorded reasons were mud and mountains poor for tanks, rain and fog that hampered air support, and worn-out units, while fresh Allied units were arriving. He also wanted to strike Montgomery before the Eighth Army attacked him; he did so at Medenine on 6 March and failed. The sources differ on the conference: Watson describes Kesselring trying and failing to persuade Rommel to go on, and dates it 23 February. The withdrawal went through the pass in good order on 22–23 February, leaving mines and demolitions behind (Howe; Budiansky; Watson).

Sources: Howe, ch. XXIV and nn. 22–23; Budiansky, Military History (2011); Watson (2007)

Read more: Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra · Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

06

Commanders

Fredendall, Rommel, von Arnim, Anderson, Eisenhower, Patton and Bradley

Who commanded what, February 1943
CommanderCommandIn the battle
Gen. Dwight D. EisenhowerAllied commander in chiefApproved the dispositions; at Sidi Bou Zid the night before the attack; relieved Fredendall
Lt. Gen. Kenneth AndersonBritish First ArmyCoordinated the front from 21 Jan; ordered the withdrawal to the Western Dorsal
Maj. Gen. Lloyd R. FredendallU.S. II CorpsFixed the dispositions; relieved 5–6 March
Maj. Gen. Orlando Ward1st Armored DivisionLost Combat Commands A and C’s tanks; relieved 5 April
Field Marshal Erwin RommelGerman-Italian Panzer Army; “Group Rommel” from 20 FebMorgenluft; the attacks at Sbiba, the pass and Thala
Generaloberst Hans-Jürgen von ArnimFifth Panzer ArmyFrühlingswind at Sidi Bou Zid; kept back the Tigers
Field Marshal Albert KesselringGerman commander in chief, SouthBacked the Tébessa thrust; agreed the withdrawal on 22 Feb
Lt. Gen. George S. Patton Jr.U.S. II Corps, 6 Mar–15 AprRestored the corps; El Guettar
Maj. Gen. Omar N. BradleyDeputy, then commander, II CorpsHill 609, Mateur and Bizerte

Sources: Howe, chs. XX–XXXIV; Playfair, vol. IV. See Chapter 2, Chapter 6 and Chapter 8.

CommandersWho was Lloyd Fredendall, and how much was he to blame?

Maj. Gen. Lloyd R. Fredendall, born at Fort D. A. Russell, Wyoming, in 1883, had commanded the Center Task Force that took Oran in Torch, and he then took II Corps to the Tunisian front. His headquarters lay in a ravine southeast of Tébessa that the troops called “Speedy Valley,” 70 to 100 road miles behind the Eastern Dorsal by different accounts (Howe; Atkinson). He issued detailed orders by radio in a homemade code, fixed battalion positions on ground he had not seen, dispersed his armor, and was barely on speaking terms with his armored division commander or with the British. But Anderson, Eisenhower and the intelligence staff in Algiers shared in the decisions that put the armor where it was on 14 February. He was relieved on 5–6 March 1943 without a formal reprimand, given the Second Army at home, promoted to lieutenant general in June 1943, and died in 1963 (Howe; Blumenson).

Sources: Howe, chs. XX–XXI and XXVIII; Atkinson (2002); Blumenson (1967)

Read more: Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal · Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

CommandersDid Rommel command at Kasserine?

For part of it. Rommel commanded the German-Italian Panzer Army retreating into southern Tunisia. The first and most damaging blow, Frühlingswind at Sidi Bou Zid on 14–17 February, belonged to von Arnim’s Fifth Panzer Army and was directed by Generalleutnant Heinz Ziegler. Rommel’s own operation, Morgenluft, took an empty Gafsa on 15 February and Fériana and Thelepte on 17 February. On 18 February he proposed a thrust on Tébessa; the Comando Supremo’s order that night gave him the 10th and 21st Panzer Divisions and aimed him at Le Kef. He directed the attacks at Sbiba and the Kasserine Pass from 19 February, watching the pass from its entrance, and took personal charge of the spearhead south of Thala on 21 February (Howe). “Group Rommel” formally took command of the attack forces at 06:00 on 20 February. Rommel left Africa on 9 March 1943 and never returned.

Sources: Howe, chs. XXI–XXIV and XXVIII; The Rommel Papers (1953)

Read more: Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid · Chapter 4: The Long Retreat · Chapter 5: The Pass · Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra

CommandersWho was von Arnim, and why did he and Rommel clash?

Generaloberst Hans-Jürgen von Arnim came from the Eastern Front to take command of the new Fifth Panzer Army in Tunisia on 9 December 1942. His EILBOTE attacks broke the French in January, and his Operation Frühlingswind destroyed Combat Command A. He and Rommel commanded separate armies, neither subordinate to the other, under Kesselring and the Italian Comando Supremo, and they disliked and distrusted each other (Howe). Von Arnim wanted limited attacks to secure his own flank; Rommel wanted a deep thrust through Tébessa. When the offensive was turned toward Le Kef, von Arnim kept back part of the 10th Panzer Division, including its Tiger battalion, a decision Kesselring later blamed for the failure and von Arnim defended. He succeeded Rommel in command of Army Group Africa in March and was captured with his headquarters near Sainte-Marie-du-Zit on 12 May 1943 (Howe; Playfair).

Sources: Howe, chs. XVII, XXI–XXIV and XXXIV; Playfair, vol. IV

Read more: Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal · Chapter 4: The Long Retreat · Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

CommandersWhat part did Kenneth Anderson play?

Lt. Gen. Kenneth A. N. Anderson commanded the British First Army, which led the race for Tunis in November 1942. On 21 January 1943 Eisenhower gave him responsibility for coordinating the British, French and American sectors, and on 24 January II Corps was attached to First Army, making him responsible for the employment of American troops (Howe). Expecting the next blow in the north, he held Combat Command B near Maktar, far from Sidi Bou Zid. On 15 February he proposed the voluntary withdrawal to the Western Dorsal that Eisenhower approved, and at about 01:30 on 17 February he authorized the evacuation of Sbeitla and Fériana. His chief of staff, Brig. McNabb, released only Gore Force to the pass on 19–20 February, while Anderson fed British reserves to Sbiba and Thala. From 19–20 February Gen. Sir Harold Alexander’s new 18th Army Group stood over him (Howe).

Sources: Howe, chs. XVIII, XXI–XXIV and XXVIII

Read more: Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal · Chapter 4: The Long Retreat · Chapter 5: The Pass

CommandersWhat was Eisenhower’s share of responsibility?

As Allied commander in chief, Eisenhower approved the command arrangements and the dispositions. On 13 February he met Anderson at Fredendall’s headquarters, judged the dispositions “as good as could be made pending the development of an actual attack,” drove forward to Sbeitla and Sidi Bou Zid that night, and returned to Tébessa shortly before the German attack began (Howe). Accounts based on the participants describe him as uneasy at the distance between the hill garrisons and the minefields not yet laid. He had allowed the dispersion of the 1st Armored Division, and he accepted his share of the responsibility. His intelligence chief, Brig. Eric Mockler-Ferryman, who expected the main blow at Fondouk, was replaced by Brig. Kenneth Strong. Afterward Eisenhower acted quickly: he sent Maj. Gen. Ernest Harmon to the front on 20 February, brought in Bradley as his observer, relieved Fredendall and gave II Corps to Patton (Howe; Atkinson).

Sources: Howe, chs. XXI, XXV and XXVIII; Atkinson (2002); Eisenhower, Crusade in Europe (1948)

Read more: Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal · Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

CommandersWhat did Patton change at II Corps?

Patton took command at Djebel Kouif on the morning of 6 March 1943 and held it until 15 April. He imposed discipline at once: steel helmets with chin straps fastened, neckties for officers, leggings, the headquarters mess closed at 07:30, and fines, usually given as $25, for violations (Bradley; D’Este). He toured the divisions constantly, demanded that officers lead from the front, and pressed for patrolling and night attacks. Under him the 1st Infantry Division retook Gafsa on 17 March and won at El Guettar on 23 March. But much of the recovery was already under way when he arrived: replacement tanks and M10 tank destroyers, battle schools, reorganized air forces and reassembled divisions. His attacks at Maknassy and east of El Guettar mostly failed, and on 5 April he relieved Maj. Gen. Orlando Ward of the 1st Armored Division. He then returned to plan the invasion of Sicily (Howe).

Sources: Howe, chs. XXVIII–XXXI; Bradley, A Soldier’s Story (1951); D’Este, Patton (1995)

Read more: Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

CommandersWhat did Omar Bradley do in Tunisia?

Maj. Gen. Omar N. Bradley, Eisenhower’s West Point classmate of 1915, arrived on 24 February 1943 as Eisenhower’s personal representative at the front, his “eyes and ears,” and reported that the division commanders had lost confidence in Fredendall. He became Patton’s deputy at II Corps on 6–7 March while keeping his direct line to Eisenhower, and took over the corps in mid-April (15 April by Howe, the 16th in other accounts). He moved the whole corps, more than 90,000 men, some 140 miles north to the coastal end of the line, and fought the methodical northern offensive of 23 April–9 May that took Hill 609, Mateur and Bizerte and ended with almost 40,000 prisoners in the corps area (Howe). Tunisia made his reputation. He went on to command II Corps in Sicily, the First Army on D-Day and the 12th Army Group in France.

Sources: Howe, chs. XXXI–XXXIV; Bradley, A Soldier’s Story (1951)

Read more: Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

07

Weapons and units

Tanks, Tigers, tank destroyers, guns and the weapons the Americans feared

The tanks of Tunisia: an honest comparison
TankMain gunThickest front armorWeight
U.S. M3 light (Stuart)37 mmabout 38–51 mmabout 13 t
U.S. M3 medium (Lee)75 mm in hull sponson, 37 mm in turretabout 51 mmabout 27 t
U.S. M4 Sherman75 mm in a full turret51 mm, slopedabout 30 t
German Panzer III5 cm short or long50 mm, some with added plateabout 22 t
German Panzer IV (F2/G)7.5 cm long (“Mark IV Special”)50 mmabout 24 t
German Tiger I8.8 cm100 mmabout 57 t

Figures rounded; metric tons. Sources: Zaloga’s Osprey armor studies; Howe. The German long guns could penetrate the front of every American tank at ordinary ranges; the American 75 had a fair chance against the Panzer III and IV but none against the front of a Tiger. See Chapter 1 and Chapter 3.

Weapons and unitsHow did American tanks compare with German tanks?

Unevenly. The American M3 light tank, the Stuart, had a 37 mm gun. The M3 medium, the Lee or Grant, carried its 75 mm gun low in a hull sponson with limited traverse and had a high silhouette. The M4 Sherman, just arriving, put the 75 in a fully traversing turret. Against them were Panzer IIIs and Panzer IVs, many of the IVs with the long 75 mm gun the Americans called the “Mark IV Special,” and a few Tigers. The Sherman’s 75 with M61 shot was rated to penetrate about 81 mm of plate at 500 yards, enough for the roughly 50 mm front of a Panzer III or IV, but not for the Tiger’s 100 mm. The German long 75s could defeat a Sherman’s front well beyond 1,000 yards (Zaloga; Bird and Livingston). On the open plains range decided the fight, as Hightower’s and Alger’s battalions found at Sidi Bou Zid (Howe).

Sources: Zaloga’s Osprey armor studies; Bird and Livingston, WWII Ballistics; Howe, ch. XXI

Read more: Chapter 1: Torch and the Race for Tunis · Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid

Weapons and unitsWere the Tigers decisive?

No. The Tiger I of schwere Panzer-Abteilung 501 was the most talked-about German weapon in Tunisia, and Americans had met it as early as 1 December 1942 near Djedeida. At Sidi Bou Zid Howe counts 11 or 12 Tigers; the German unit history says six Tigers and nine Panzer IIIs of the battalion’s 1st Company were attached to the 10th Panzer Division (Schneider). German claims that Tigers knocked out 20 Shermans there cannot be checked against American records. Most American losses came from Panzer IVs, antitank guns, 88s and dive bombers. In the Kasserine Pass itself there were no Tigers: von Arnim kept the 10th Panzer’s heavy tank battalion in the north. The Tiger’s effect was partly psychological, and soldiers began calling almost any German tank a Tiger. Americans got their first close look at one knocked out near Béja in April 1943 (Howe; Zaloga).

Sources: Howe, chs. XXI and XXIII; Schneider, Tigers in Combat (2004); Zaloga

Read more: Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid · Chapter 5: The Pass

Weapons and unitsWhat were tank destroyers, and how did they do?

Tank destroyers were the Army’s answer, shaped by the 1941 maneuvers, to massed enemy armor: self-propelled antitank guns in separate battalions under the doctrine “seek, strike and destroy.” In Tunisia they were improvisations: the M3 gun motor carriage, an old 75 mm field gun on a half-track, and the M6, a 37 mm gun on a light Dodge truck; the full-tracked M10 with a 3-inch gun arrived in 1943. At Sidi Bou Zid the 701st Tank Destroyer Battalion’s half-tracks had about the punch of a Sherman and far less protection. Their best day came at El Guettar on 23 March 1943, when the 601st Tank Destroyer Battalion, with M10s of the 899th, fought the 10th Panzer Division from shallow positions in the open; it lost 21 of its 31 M3s by the ABMC’s count, was credited with 37 tanks and won a Presidential Unit Citation (Howe; Yeide).

Sources: Howe, chs. XXI and XXVIII; Yeide, The Tank Killers (2004); ABMC; Gabel, The U.S. Army GHQ Maneuvers of 1941

Read more: Chapter 1: Torch and the Race for Tunis · Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid · Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

Weapons and unitsHow good was the American artillery?

It was the American arm the Germans respected most. In the 1930s the Field Artillery School at Fort Sill, under Maj. Carlos Brewer and then Maj. Orlando Ward, later the commander of the 1st Armored Division, developed the fire direction center, which computed firing data for a whole battalion from a forward observer’s call and let several battalions on a surveyed grid mass their fire on one target within minutes (Dastrup). In Tunisia it proved itself at Sbiba, where American guns fired more than 100 concentrations on 19 February; at Thala, with Irwin’s 48 howitzers on 22 February; at Djebel el Hamra and Hill 812; and at El Guettar, where artillery and tank destroyers knocked out nearly thirty German tanks (Howe). The reports from Tunisia recommended that “three battalions of artillery should support one battalion of tanks in an attack” (Howe, ch. XXXV).

Sources: Howe, chs. XXIII–XXIV, XXVIII and XXXV; Dastrup, Fires (January 2011)

Read more: Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra · Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

Weapons and unitsWhich Axis weapons did the Americans fear most?

Besides the tanks: the 88 mm gun used against ground targets, more dangerous than any American weapon of its kind; the 7.5 cm Pak 40 antitank gun, hidden in olive groves and wadis, which broke the American tank attacks at Faïd on 31 January and 1 February; and the Ju 87 Stuka dive bomber, which destroyed the 2nd Battalion, 17th Field Artillery, at Sidi Bou Zid on 14 February. At the pass on 20 February the Germans brought up a battery of new rocket projectors, Nebelwerfers, which soldiers came to call “Screaming Meemies.” Howe does not give the model; secondary accounts say the 21 cm Nebelwerfer 42, though the German losses for the operation include four 150 mm launchers, the caliber of the older model. The Italian Centauro Division’s M14/41 tanks were outclassed by 1943, but its Bersaglieri fought hard at the pass (Howe; Craven and Cate).

Sources: Howe, chs. XX–XXIII; Craven and Cate, vol. 2; mikesresearch.com

Read more: Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal · Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid · Chapter 5: The Pass

08

Special units and heroes

The people and units whose conduct the record documents

Distinguished Service Cross · posthumous

Sgt. Frank F. Aiello, Company M, 39th Infantry, Kasserine Pass, 20 February 1943

Aiello led a section of machine guns of the 3d Battalion, 39th Infantry, in the pass. Badly wounded by a grenade, he refused to leave his position and kept directing his guns; when his platoon’s sector could no longer be held, he stayed behind alone to cover his men’s withdrawal and was mortally wounded. His cross was awarded by Department of the Army General Orders No. 16 of 5 March 1948 (9th Infantry Division DSC roll). See Chapter 5.

Special units and heroesWho were the heroes of Kasserine?

The record names many. Col. Anderson T. W. Moore organized the defense of the pass with his engineers, and Lt. Col. Gerald C. Kelleher’s 1st Battalion, 26th Infantry, held its northern side. Col. Thomas D. Drake held Djebel Ksaira for three days and refused to surrender. Lt. Col. Louis V. Hightower placed his tank between German armor and a withdrawing column and fought on until it burned. Brig. Gen. Paul Robinett fought a model delaying action at Sbeitla and held Djebel el Hamra, and Lt. Col. Henry E. Gardiner, a Chicago lawyer before the war, led his tanks off the field last. Brig. Gen. S. LeRoy Irwin brought his guns to Thala. On the British side Brig. Charles Dunphie and Lt. Col. Adrian Gore fought with outgunned tanks. And Sgt. Frank F. Aiello of the 39th Infantry, badly wounded, stayed behind alone to cover his men’s withdrawal in the pass on 20 February and was killed (Howe; DSC citations).

Sources: Howe, chs. XXI–XXIV; Distinguished Service Cross citations (Home of Heroes; 9th Infantry Division DSC roll)

Read more: Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid · Chapter 4: The Long Retreat · Chapter 5: The Pass · Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra

Special units and heroesWho was Col. Thomas D. Drake?

Drake, born in West Virginia in 1900, enlisted at 16 by misstating his age and won the Distinguished Service Cross as a sergeant in France in 1918. He took command of the 168th Infantry, Iowa National Guard, in January 1943 and led it at Sened Station, winning the Silver Star. At Sidi Bou Zid he held Djebel Ksaira and Garet Hadid for three days under orders to stay, asked in vain to withdraw, and led the attempt to walk out on the night of 16–17 February. When a German officer called on him to surrender on the 17th, he is said to have answered in four words. The exchange, “Colonel, you surrender.” — “You go to hell,” rests on the recollection of Drake and his officers (CMH readings, as quoted by Rogers). He became the first senior American officer at Oflag 64, was repatriated in 1944, received an oak leaf cluster to his DSC, and died in 1970.

Sources: Rogers, “Colonel Thomas Davisson Drake” (Kriegy Research Group), citing the CMH Kasserine Pass Battles readings; Howe, ch. XXII

Read more: Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid

Special units and heroesWho was John K. Waters?

Lt. Col. John K. Waters, a 1931 West Point graduate and Patton’s son-in-law, led the flying column that took Tafaraoui airfield near Oran on 8 November 1942 and the light tanks that fought the first American tank battle against German armor at Chouïgui on 26 November. At Sidi Bou Zid he commanded the Lessouda force and reported the German envelopment by radio until his communications failed. He was captured on the hill; accounts differ on whether that was on 14 February or after the breakout of 15–16 February (Howe; Keiler). He spent two years in German camps, at Oflag 64 in occupied Poland and then Hammelburg in Bavaria, where on 27 March 1945 he was badly wounded by a guard during the raid of Task Force Baum, which Patton had ordered. He later commanded U.S. Army, Pacific, and retired as a four-star general. He died in 1989. His decorations include the Distinguished Service Cross.

Sources: Howe, chs. XI, XVI and XXI; Keiler, Warfare History Network; Wikipedia, “John K. Waters” and “Task Force Baum”

Read more: Chapter 1: Torch and the Race for Tunis · Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

Special units and heroesWhat did the 1st Ranger Battalion do in Tunisia?

The 1st Ranger Battalion, raised in Northern Ireland in June 1942 on the British commando model under William O. Darby, led the landing at Arzew in Torch and was used in Tunisia for raids and reconnaissance. On the night of 11–12 February 1943 three of its companies marched on foot to the Italian outpost at Sened Station, held by men of the 10th Bersaglieri Regiment, and attacked at 01:00 with rifles, grenades and bayonets. By the Army’s own study they killed or wounded an estimated 75 Italians and took eleven prisoners, for one Ranger killed and twenty wounded (King). Darby won the Silver Star. The battalion was the last unit out of Gafsa on 14–15 February, led the way to El Guettar in March and won a Distinguished Unit Citation. Darby was killed in Italy on 30 April 1945 and promoted posthumously to brigadier general.

Sources: King, Rangers: Selected Combat Operations in World War II (1985); Darby’s Silver Star citation; Howe, chs. XXI and XXVIII

Read more: Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal · Chapter 4: The Long Retreat · Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

Special units and heroesWho was Ernie Pyle, and what did he write about Kasserine?

Ernie Pyle of the Scripps-Howard newspapers was the best-known American reporter in North Africa. He stayed with the troops through Kasserine, El Guettar and the final battles, writing about soldiers rather than generals. His dispatch of 4 March 1943, printed in the Pittsburgh Press the next day and written before the Allies retook the lost ground, described the withdrawal from the Sbeitla valley back through the pass as “a majestic thing in a way”: it started before dawn one morning and went on without a break for 24 hours. He wrote under censorship and from what he saw; the night stampede at Sbeitla is not in it. His North African columns were collected as Here Is Your War (1943). He won the Pulitzer Prize in 1944 and was killed on Ie Shima, near Okinawa, on 18 April 1945 (Pyle; National WWII Museum).

Sources: Pyle, Scripps-Howard column, Pittsburgh Press, 5 March 1943; Pyle, Here Is Your War (1943); National WWII Museum

Read more: Chapter 4: The Long Retreat · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

Special units and heroesWere any Medals of Honor awarded for Kasserine?

Not for the February battles, as far as the published award lists show. The highest decorations were Distinguished Service Crosses, among them those of Lt. Col. Louis V. Hightower (14 February), Lt. Col. John K. Waters (14 February, awarded in 1945), Col. Thomas D. Drake (an oak leaf cluster for 14–16 February), Lt. Col. Henry E. Gardiner (Sbeitla) and Sgt. Frank F. Aiello (the pass, 20 February, posthumous, awarded in 1948). Medals of Honor were won elsewhere in the campaign: by Col. Demas T. Craw and Maj. Pierpont M. Hamilton at Port-Lyautey and Col. William H. Wilbur at Fedala in November 1942, and by Pvt. Robert D. Booker at Fondouk on 9 April and Pvt. Nicholas Minue near Medjez el Bab on 28 April 1943, both posthumously. Minue is the one Medal of Honor recipient buried at the North Africa American Cemetery (citations; ABMC).

Sources: Medal of Honor and DSC citations (Home of Heroes; Military Times Hall of Valor; 9th Infantry Division DSC roll); ABMC

Read more: Chapter 1: Torch and the Race for Tunis · Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid · Chapter 5: The Pass · Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

09

The Axis side and its crimes

The German and Italian forces, and the SS persecution of Tunisia’s Jews

The Axis side and its crimesWhat was Kampfgruppe DAK?

It was the Afrika Korps assault group Rommel formed for Operation Morgenluft: a German-Italian force of about division strength built around the headquarters of the Deutsches Afrikakorps, with Panzer Grenadier Regiment Afrika, two weak Luftwaffe Jäger battalions, a tank battalion of the 15th Panzer Division with 26 tanks, the 33rd Reconnaissance Battalion, artillery, engineers and strong antiaircraft units, plus Italian Centauro infantry, Bersaglieri, artillery and 23 tanks: about 49 tanks in all (Howe, ch. XXII). It entered Gafsa on 15 February and Fériana and Thelepte on 17 February. When its first commander, Oberst Kurt von Liebenstein, was wounded by a mine, Gen. Karl Bülowius, Rommel’s chief engineer, took over and led the assault on the pass. Bülowius was captured in May 1943 and took his own life at Camp Forrest, Tennessee, on 27 March 1945; he is buried in Chattanooga National Cemetery.

Sources: Howe, chs. XXII–XXIII and n. 6; Wikipedia, “Karl Bülowius”

Read more: Chapter 4: The Long Retreat · Chapter 5: The Pass

The Axis side and its crimesWhat happened to the Jews of Tunisia under German occupation?

For the roughly 90,000 Jews of Tunisia the six-month German occupation brought the Holocaust to Africa. An SS Einsatzkommando of the Security Police and SD under Walther Rauff arrived with the troops. On 8 December 1942 it demanded 3,000 Jewish laborers for the next morning; when about a hundred appeared, the SS seized Jews in the streets on 9 December and took hostages (Harif, after Claude Nataf). Yad Vashem counts almost 5,000 Jews held in 32 labor camps; the USHMM estimates about 5,000 men in some forty camps. They dug fortifications for the Axis armies near the front and worked in ports and at airfields, wearing a yellow star on their backs, beaten by guards and bombed by Allied aircraft; dozens died. Communities paid heavy fines, and on Djerba Rauff’s men took about 43 kg of gold. The Germans did not have time to deport Tunisia’s Jews (Yad Vashem; USHMM).

Sources: Yad Vashem, “The Jews of Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia”; USHMM, “Labor and Internment Camps in North Africa”; Harif (2022); Montreal Holocaust Museum

Read more: Chapter 1: Torch and the Race for Tunis · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

The Axis side and its crimesWho was Walther Rauff, and was he ever punished?

SS-Obersturmbannführer Walther Rauff had overseen, in the Reich Security Main Office in Berlin, the development of the gas vans used to murder Jews and others in occupied Poland and the Soviet Union. His Einsatzkommando had been formed in the summer of 1942 to follow Rommel toward Egypt and Palestine, a mission ended by the defeat at El Alamein, and it went to Tunis instead (Mallmann and Cüppers). After Tunisia he ran the Security Police and SD in northwestern Italy. Arrested at the end of the war, he escaped from an American internment camp at Rimini in December 1946 and reached Syria, Ecuador and finally Chile. Arrested at West Germany’s request in December 1962, he was freed in 1963 when the Chilean Supreme Court ruled that the crimes were too old to prosecute; later requests, including one in 1983, were refused. He died in Santiago on 14 May 1984, never tried (Wikipedia, citing the New York Times).

Sources: Yad Vashem; Mallmann and Cüppers, Nazi Palestine (2010); Wikipedia, “Walter Rauff”

Read more: Chapter 1: Torch and the Race for Tunis · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

The Axis side and its crimesDid any Tunisians help the Jews?

Yes, though the record is still being gathered. The American scholar Robert Satloff, in Among the Righteous (2006), documented Arab Tunisians who sheltered Jews during the occupation, among them Khaled Abdul-Wahab, who hid Jewish families on his farm near Mahdia. The German propaganda photograph of Jewish laborers marched through Tunis in December 1942 carries a caption claiming that the Arab population watched “with visible satisfaction,” a line written for the German press, not a record of what the onlookers felt. The memory of the six months was long kept mainly within the Tunisian Jewish community, most of whose members later emigrated to France and Israel. Since the 2000s historians in France, Israel and Tunisia, and institutions such as Yad Vashem and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, have collected testimony and documents (Satloff; Yad Vashem; USHMM).

Sources: Satloff, Among the Righteous (2006); Yad Vashem; USHMM; Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-J20384

Read more: Chapter 1: Torch and the Race for Tunis · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

The Axis side and its crimesDid the German units at Kasserine commit war crimes?

In the February battles the record is of a hard but conventional fight; the chapters found no specific war crimes recorded against Kampfgruppe DAK in those days. The 10th Panzer Division had an earlier record: its troops and the attached Grossdeutschland Regiment are blamed for the massacre of captured Senegalese and North African riflemen of the French Army at Chasselay, near Lyon, on 19–20 June 1940 (Lengel, National WWII Museum). The great crime of the occupation of Tunisia was the persecution of the Jews by Rauff’s SS unit, carried out behind the front the German army held, with Jewish forced laborers digging fortifications for the Axis armies. This collection shows Axis units only on factual record cards, with original period-style markers labeled as illustrations, and shows no SS insignia (Yad Vashem; USHMM).

Sources: Lengel, National WWII Museum, as cited in Wikipedia, “10th Panzer Division”; Yad Vashem; USHMM

Read more: Chapter 5: The Pass · Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

10

The air war

Mud strips, the air umbrella, one air commander, Flax and the Tuskegee Airmen

The myth

The Americans lost at Kasserine because the Luftwaffe owned the sky and the U.S. air forces did nothing to help the troops.

The record

The Axis did hold local air superiority through the winter, mainly because its all-weather fields were close to the front. But sirocco dust, rain and fog grounded both sides at the critical moments of 19–21 February, and once the weather cleared the XII Air Support Command flew 114 sorties on 22 February and hit the withdrawing columns hard on the 23rd. The lesson the airmen drew was about organization and airfields (Craven and Cate; Chapter 7).

By the numbers

XII Air Support Command, 26 January 1943

Aircraft available to support II Corps in central Tunisia, three weeks before Kasserine.

Curtiss P-40 Warhawk fighters52
Douglas A-20 Havoc light bombers27
Bell P-39 Airacobra fighters23
Douglas DB-7 light bombers8
Source: Craven and Cate, The Army Air Forces in World War II, vol. 2, ch. 5. Total 110. On 17 February 124 operational aircraft were flown out of Thelepte. See Chapter 7.
The air warDid the Germans control the air at Kasserine?

Over the front through most of the winter, yes. The Luftwaffe flew from all-weather fields at Tunis, Bizerte, Kairouan, Sfax and Gabès, minutes from the battle, while the Allies had only four hard-surfaced fields between Casablanca and the Tunisian border and flew from distant or mired strips such as Youks-les-Bains and Souk el Arba (Craven and Cate). Stukas destroyed an American artillery battalion at Sidi Bou Zid. But during the fight for the pass sirocco dust on 19 February and rain and fog on 20–21 February grounded both sides; Howe notes that the German infantry attacking the pass lacked their usual air support. When the weather cleared on 22 February the XII Air Support Command flew 23 missions and 114 sorties from Youks, and on 23 February it attacked the withdrawing columns, in what Rommel called “hammer-blow air attacks” (Craven and Cate; Playfair).

Sources: Craven and Cate, vol. 2, chs. 3–5; Howe, ch. XXIII; Playfair, vol. IV, p. 302

Read more: Chapter 7: The Air War

The air warWhat was the “air umbrella” argument?

Ground commanders who had been bombed wanted fighters patrolling continuously over their troops. Airmen argued that standing patrols wasted aircraft and pilots, could not be kept up from distant fields and left the German airfields untouched; the way to protect the troops was to win control of the air. The Army’s doctrine of the time, FM 31-35 (April 1942), let air units be allotted to ground commanders and was vague about control. Air Marshal Sir Arthur Coningham, taking over the Allied tactical air forces, ordered on 18 February 1943 that umbrellas be abandoned unless specifically authorized (Craven and Cate). The quarrel peaked on 1–5 April, when a II Corps report under Patton complained of “total lack of air cover” and Coningham’s widely circulated reply questioned the troops; Tedder made Coningham withdraw it and apologize (Mortensen; Howe).

Sources: Craven and Cate, vol. 2, chs. 5–6; Mortensen, Airpower and Ground Armies (1998); Howe, ch. XXIX

Read more: Chapter 7: The Air War · Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

The air warHow did the Allies reorganize their air forces?

In the middle of the Kasserine battle. On 17–18 February 1943 the Mediterranean Air Command under Air Chief Marshal Sir Arthur Tedder took charge of all Allied air forces in the Mediterranean, and the Northwest African Air Forces were activated under Maj. Gen. Carl Spaatz, organized by function rather than nationality: the Northwest African Tactical Air Force under Coningham, with Brig. Gen. Laurence Kuter as his deputy; the Strategic Air Force under Doolittle; and coastal, training, service and photographic commands (Craven and Cate). Coningham’s principle was that the army and air commanders were equals who planned together. The lessons were written into War Department Field Manual 100-20, published on 21 July 1943, which declared land power and air power “co-equal and interdependent” and said air power must be controlled centrally through the air force commander (FM 100-20).

Sources: Craven and Cate, vol. 2, ch. 5; FM 100-20, Command and Employment of Air Power (21 July 1943)

Read more: Chapter 7: The Air War · Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

The air warWhat was Operation Flax?

Flax was the Allied campaign, launched on 5 April 1943, to destroy the Axis air transport fleet flying supplies across the Sicilian Strait. Its best-known day was Palm Sunday, 18 April, when four P-40 squadrons of the 57th and 324th Fighter Groups, with Spitfires above, caught a large formation of Ju 52s low over the Gulf of Tunis. The pilots’ first claims reached 146; they were later reduced to 58 or 59 Ju 52s and about 16 to 18 escorting fighters, for six P-40s and one Spitfire lost (Craven and Cate; 57th Fighter Group history). German records give lower figures: the AAF history says the Germans admitted 51 Ju 52s, and the figures often cited today are 24 Ju 52s shot down and 35 more damaged and crash-landed (Murawski). On 22 April a formation of Me 323 Gigants carrying fuel was destroyed. By May more than 600 wrecked or abandoned Axis aircraft lay on Tunisian fields (Craven and Cate).

Sources: Craven and Cate, vol. 2, ch. 6; Murawski (2009) and Levine (2008), as cited in Wikipedia, “Operation Flax”

Read more: Chapter 7: The Air War

The air warDid the Tuskegee Airmen fight in Tunisia?

Not in the campaign itself, which ended on 13 May 1943. The 99th Fighter Squadron, the first Black American flying unit sent overseas, under Lt. Col. Benjamin O. Davis Jr., arrived at Casablanca on 24 April 1943 and trained near Fez in Morocco. Attached to the 33rd Fighter Group on 29 May, it moved to Fardjouna on Cap Bon in Tunisia and flew its first combat mission on 2 June 1943, in the air campaign against Pantelleria, which surrendered on 11 June. On 2 July, over Sicily, 1st Lt. Charles B. Hall was credited with the first aerial victory of the Tuskegee Airmen (Haulman). In September 1943 senior commanders, drawing partly on a critical report by Col. William Momyer, recommended taking the squadron out of combat; an Army statistical study released in March 1944 found that it had performed about as well as the other P-40 squadrons in the theater (Haulman; Commemorative Air Force archive).

Sources: Haulman, A Tuskegee Airmen Chronology (AFHRA, 2016); Commemorative Air Force Rise Above archive

Read more: Chapter 7: The Air War

11

Myths and the record

Famous stories set beside what the sources show

The myth

Kasserine Pass was the U.S. Army’s first battle against the Germans.

The record

Americans had fought Germans in Tunisia since November 1942, at Medjez el Bab, Djedeida, Chouïgui, Tebourba and Longstop Hill, and on the Eastern Dorsal in January. What was new in February was the scale of the attack and the presence of Rommel (Howe; Chapter 1).

The myth

A few hundred raw engineers were left alone in the pass and fled at the first sight of German tanks.

The record

The engineers held half the pass as part of a force of about 2,000 men, soon reinforced, held through all of 19 February, stopped the first tank attack at their minefield and lost their position only about noon on the 20th. Most of their losses, 89 of 128, were missing, the mark of a unit overrun rather than one that ran (Howe; Chapter 5).

The myth

Kasserine proved Rommel’s genius: the Desert Fox ran rings around the green Americans and would have reached the sea but for bad luck.

The record

The success of 14–17 February was planned and fought mainly by von Arnim’s army under Ziegler. The Axis effort was divided and lost days to argument; Rommel’s own thrusts at Thala, Sbiba and Djebel el Hamra all failed, and he called off the attack himself on 22 February (Howe; Blumenson; Chapter 9).

Myths and the recordDid the Americans simply run at Kasserine?

The record does not support it. There were real routs: Combat Command A on 14 February, the night stampede of rear-echelon traffic at Sbeitla on 16–17 February, and the break in the pass on 20 February. But most of the failures were of organization and command: dispersed positions chosen by higher headquarters, armor fed in by companies, faulty intelligence, a distant corps commander and no tested drill for working with aircraft. Where units were well placed and well led, they fought hard: the 168th Infantry on its hills, the engineers and the 26th Infantry in the pass, Robinett’s Combat Command B, and the gunners at Thala, Sbiba and Djebel el Hamra (Howe; Blumenson). Rommel wrote that the Americans in the pass had fought superbly, and noted how quickly they learned (Krieg ohne Hass, as quoted by Howe; Lewin). Within a month the 1st Infantry Division beat the 10th Panzer Division at El Guettar.

Sources: Howe, chs. XXII–XXIV and n. 46; Blumenson (1986); Lewin, Rommel as Military Commander

Read more: Chapter 5: The Pass · Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

Myths and the recordDid Rommel’s offensive run out of fuel?

No. Fuel was a constant Axis worry in Tunisia, but on 22 February Rommel’s forces had fuel for roughly another 250 to 300 km and about four days’ rations, with reserve stocks behind them, though ammunition was getting low (Calhoun, National WWII Museum, 2023). His recorded reasons for stopping were the ground, the weather and the wear on his units (Howe). The thrusts toward Thala and Tébessa had been stopped by Allied defenders, and the Axis forces withdrew in good order with most of their equipment. The Germans had even taken fuel from the Allies: a German radio message reported 20 tons of aviation gasoline and 30 tons of lubricants salvaged at Thelepte, and Howe records more than 215 cubic meters (about 57,000 U.S. gallons) of gasoline and lubricants captured at Kasserine. Whether a drive on Tébessa could have succeeded cannot be known; it was proposed late and never tried.

Sources: Calhoun, “Kasserine Pass: German Offensive, American Victory” (National WWII Museum, 2023); Howe, chs. XXII and XXIV

Read more: Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra · Chapter 4: The Long Retreat · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

Myths and the recordDid Fredendall hide in a finished bunker throughout the battle?

Not as the legend has it. A company of the 19th Engineers did spend about three weeks tunneling shelters into a ravine southeast of Tébessa that the troops called “Speedy Valley”: two U-shaped galleries, each reported at about 160 feet. The troops’ nicknames for it said what they thought of it, and the corps command post was far from the front (Atkinson, as summarized; Warfare History Network). But the sources the chapters rely on do not show that the tunnels were ever finished or occupied; during the German advance the headquarters moved back to a schoolhouse at El Kouif, and the tunneling ended. Fredendall did leave the ravine: Howe records him at Sbeitla on 10 February, and on 20 February he drove down the Thala road toward the pass. Bradley later wrote that the tunnels embarrassed every American soldier who saw them. Fredendall’s real failures lay in his orders. The bunker was a symptom, not the cause.

Sources: Howe, chs. XX and XXIII; Atkinson (2002); Warfare History Network; Bradley, A Soldier’s Story

Read more: Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal · Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

Myths and the recordDid Patton single-handedly turn II Corps around?

No. Patton commanded II Corps for six weeks, from 6 March to 15 April 1943, and restored its discipline and drive. But the corps had already helped stop Rommel at Thala, Sbiba and Djebel el Hamra before he arrived, and new tanks, M10 tank destroyers, battle schools, reassembled divisions and reorganized air forces were in hand. El Guettar, on 23 March, was a defensive victory won by Terry Allen’s 1st Infantry Division, its artillery and the 601st and 899th Tank Destroyer Battalions. Patton’s attacks at Maknassy and east of El Guettar mostly failed, and the final campaign that took Hill 609, Mateur and Bizerte was fought under Bradley (Howe). The film Patton (1970), which opens in the aftermath of Kasserine, did much to fix the legend. Patton gave a shaken corps its nerve back; he did not do it alone.

Sources: Howe, chs. XXVIII–XXXIV; Blumenson, Patton (1985); D’Este (1995)

Read more: Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

Myths and the recordWas Red Oak, Iowa, the hardest-hit town in America?

The claim is often made, and the record does not support it. Red Oak, a county seat of about 5,800 people in 1940, received more than 100 telegrams reporting its soldiers missing, and 45 of its men were captured or killed in the Kasserine battles, most of them National Guardsmen of the 168th Infantry taken on the hills at Sidi Bou Zid (Atkinson, p. 397). The town has often been said to have suffered more casualties in proportion to its population than any other American community in the war. The final casualty statistics do not bear that out: a 1946 Iowa newspaper report ranked Montgomery County, of which Red Oak is the seat, third among Iowa counties in war dead per head (Council Bluffs Nonpareil, as cited). What is true is that the losses fell heavily on a few small towns whose sons had joined the same Guard companies.

Sources: Atkinson, An Army at Dawn, p. 397; Time (1966) and Council Bluffs Nonpareil (1946), as cited in Wikipedia, “Red Oak, Iowa”

Read more: Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid

12

Numbers

Casualties, prisoners and equipment, with the sources’ ranges

By the numbers

Axis prisoners in Tunisia, May 1943: the estimates

Different counts of the prisoners taken in the campaign, and the share taken by II Corps on 9–10 May.

U.S. official history (Howe)275,000
Atkinson’s estimatec. 250,000
18th Army Group count244,500
British official history (Playfair)238,243
… of which German (Playfair)101,784
… of which Italian (Playfair)89,442
Taken in the II Corps area, 9–10 Mayc. 40,000
Sources: Playfair, vol. IV, p. 460; Atkinson, p. 537; Howe, ch. XXXIV. Playfair’s total includes 47,017 prisoners of unidentified nationality. See Chapter 8.
Figures that are often misquoted
FigureWhat it really isSource
2,546Prisoners claimed by the 21st Panzer Division, 14–17 February, not American deadHowe, ch. XXII
34 aircraftAircraft demolished at Thelepte by an engineer’s report; the air force history counts 18 burnedHowe, n. 35; Craven and Cate
800 milesThe 9th Division Artillery’s march by Howe’s count; a division history gives 735Howe; 9th Division Assn.
4,026Allied prisoners of all nations claimed by the Germans for the offensiveHowe, ch. XXIV
18,221American battle casualties in the whole campaign, not at Kasserine alonePlayfair; Atkinson

See Chapter 4, Chapter 6 and Chapter 9.

NumbersHow many Americans were killed, wounded and captured at Kasserine?

Between about 6,000 and 7,000 in the February battles. The figure most often quoted, from Martin Blumenson’s essay in America’s First Battles (1986), is about 300 killed, 3,000 wounded and 3,000 missing, nearly all of the missing prisoners; Britannica gives about 6,500, and Stephen Budiansky “nearly 7,000.” Blumenson adds that about 7,000 replacements were needed. Most of the loss came in the first four days around Sidi Bou Zid, not in the pass. The counts firmed up only over weeks, as men walked back, bodies were found and Red Cross prisoner lists arrived. Beware one figure: the 2,546 sometimes printed as American “killed” at Sidi Bou Zid is the 21st Panzer Division’s claim of prisoners for 14–17 February, not deaths (Howe). In the pass itself three units reported 28 killed, 93 wounded and 344 missing.

Sources: Blumenson (1986), p. 261; Encyclopaedia Britannica; Budiansky, HistoryNet; Howe, chs. XXII and XXIV, n. 45

Read more: Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory · Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid · Chapter 5: The Pass

NumbersWhat did the Germans and Italians lose?

Much less. German records cited by Howe give 201 killed, 536 wounded and 252 missing for the whole offensive of 14–24 February, 989 in all, with 20 tanks, 67 vehicles and 14 guns lost; Britannica, using other counts, gives about 2,000 Axis casualties and 34 tanks. Italian losses, mostly in the Centauro Division and the Bersaglieri, were never fully recorded in the English-language sources. The Allies took 73 German and 535 Italian prisoners (Blumenson). The Germans claimed 3,721 Allied prisoners from their two operations, and a consolidated report of 24 February counted 4,026 (Howe). Measured in casualties, Kasserine was a clear German victory, six or seven Allied casualties for every German one. Measured against its aims, it failed: the Allies could replace 183 lost tanks, and the Germans could not replace the fuel, time and reputation they had spent (Howe; Blumenson).

Sources: Howe, ch. XXIV and n. 44; Blumenson (1986), p. 260; Encyclopaedia Britannica

Read more: Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory · Chapter 6: Thala and Djebel el Hamra

NumbersHow much equipment did II Corps lose?

By Blumenson’s count, 183 tanks, 104 half-tracks, 208 guns and 512 trucks and other vehicles in the February battles, some of them captured and put to use by the Germans. The heaviest losses came at Sidi Bou Zid: Combat Command A lost 44 tanks on 14 February (Howe), Combat Command C 46 medium tanks on 15 February (Watson), and one participant tallied 98 tanks, 57 half-tracks and 29 guns lost by the 1st Armored Division in those two days (Newton). At Thelepte 18 to 34 aircraft were destroyed on the ground and 60,000 gallons of aviation fuel poured out. Much of the rest was destroyed or abandoned by the Americans themselves during the retreat, at Sbeitla, Fériana and Kasserine. Even so, at 19:00 on 20 February II Corps still counted 99 medium and 47 light tanks operational, with 74 more out of action (Howe).

Sources: Blumenson (1986), p. 261; Howe, chs. XXI–XXIV; Watson (2007); Newton (2002); Craven and Cate, vol. 2

Read more: Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid · Chapter 4: The Long Retreat · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

NumbersWhat did the whole Tunisian campaign cost?

By the British official history’s figures, 76,020 Allied casualties from November 1942 to 13 May 1943: 38,360 British and Commonwealth (6,233 killed, 21,528 wounded, 10,599 missing), 19,439 French (2,156 killed, 10,276 wounded, 7,007 missing) and 18,221 Americans (2,715 killed, 8,978 wounded, 6,528 missing) (Playfair, vol. IV; Atkinson). The U.S. Army’s campaign brochure gives the same American figures within about 70,000 Allied casualties. The French losses, mostly of North African soldiers of the Armée d’Afrique who held the mountain center of the line all winter with old weapons, exceeded the American. Axis records were largely lost at the surrender; Atkinson estimates about 8,500 German and 3,700 Italian dead and 40,000 to 50,000 wounded. The 6,000 to 7,000 American casualties of February were roughly a third of the American total for the campaign.

Sources: Playfair, vol. IV, p. 460; Atkinson, pp. 536–537; Anderson, Tunisia (CMH, 1993)

Read more: Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

NumbersHow many Axis soldiers surrendered in Tunisia?

The counts differ: 238,243 unwounded prisoners in the British official history (101,784 German, 89,442 Italian and 47,017 not identified by nationality); 244,500 in 18th Army Group’s count, including 157,000 Germans; more than 275,000 in the U.S. official history; and about a quarter of a million by Rick Atkinson’s estimate (Playfair, vol. IV; Howe; Atkinson). The differences come from double counting in the confusion of the last days and from what each count includes. Almost 40,000 surrendered to the U.S. II Corps in the north on 9–10 May. Von Arnim was captured on 12 May, and Messe surrendered the Italian First Army on 13 May. Far more Axis soldiers surrendered in Tunisia than the roughly 91,000 taken at Stalingrad three months earlier, which is why the campaign was nicknamed “Tunisgrad.”

Sources: Playfair, vol. IV, p. 460; Howe, ch. XXXIV; Atkinson, p. 537

Read more: Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

13

Lessons the Army learned

What changed after Kasserine, from training to medicine, and where it led

In their words
LAND POWER AND AIR POWER ARE CO-EQUAL AND INTERDEPENDENT FORCES; NEITHER IS AN AUXILIARY OF THE OTHER.
War Department Field Manual 100-20, Command and Employment of Air Power, 21 July 1943, section I, paragraph 1, the doctrine drawn from Tunisia. See Chapter 7.
Lessons the Army learnedWhat did the Army learn from Kasserine?

Concrete things, and quickly. Units had been spread too far apart on hilltops that could be surrounded one by one; armor had been parceled out in small packets; commanders had stayed too far back; reconnaissance, map reading, patrolling and night movement had been weak; infantry had dug shallow slit trenches on exposed crests (Howe; Westrate). The Army’s campaign brochure states the greater lesson simply: maintain concentration of tanks (Anderson, CMH). The corrections came within weeks. Divisions fought as divisions, and II Corps fought as a corps on its own front; training at home became harder and more realistic, with live fire; commanders who failed were relieved and those who did well were moved up. The War Department published Lessons from the Tunisian Campaign in 1943. Above all, Kasserine showed that men who had trained for a year or more were not ready for the German army until they had fought it (Howe, ch. XXXV).

Sources: Howe, ch. XXXV; Anderson, Tunisia (CMH, 1993); Westrate (1944); War Department, Lessons from the Tunisian Campaign (1943)

Read more: Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

Lessons the Army learnedHow did the use of American divisions change?

The main change was to keep them whole. At Sidi Bou Zid the 1st Armored Division fought as scattered combat commands under several headquarters, with its commander bypassed, and the 1st Infantry Division was spread across the front in combat teams. From March the American divisions in Tunisia fought, as far as possible, as divisions, and from late April II Corps fought as a corps of four divisions on its own front under Bradley, the arrangement the inquests had called for. Eisenhower insisted from then on that American forces fight under American command at corps level and above wherever possible, a principle that shaped the Allied armies in Sicily and Normandy (Howe). Armored units were told to attack in depth on narrow fronts and to take time to prepare; the tank destroyers’ half-tracks gave way to M10s and towed guns; and in 1944 the Army reorganized its armored divisions on a lighter pattern (Howe).

Sources: Howe, chs. XXXI and XXXV

Read more: Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

Lessons the Army learnedWhat did military medicine learn in Tunisia?

Three lessons that shaped American military medicine for the rest of the war. First, air evacuation: C-47s carrying 18 litter patients each flew wounded men from forward strips such as Youks-les-Bains back to Algeria, and the II Corps surgeon reported 3,313 patients evacuated by air from January to 15 May. Second, plasma was found to be “not a complete substitute for blood in combat surgery”; the 48th Surgical Hospital at Gafsa ran an informal blood bank with 25 to 50 soldier donors a day, the seed of the theater blood bank. Third, forward psychiatric care: at El Guettar and Maknassy psychiatric cases were 20 percent of battlefield evacuations, fewer than 3 percent of those sent far to the rear early in the campaign returned to combat, but by the last phase 58 to 63 percent of cases treated near the front returned to duty (Wiltse).

Sources: Wiltse, Medical Service in the Mediterranean and Minor Theaters (1965), ch. III

Read more: Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

Lessons the Army learnedWhy is Kasserine compared with Task Force Smith?

Because both are the Army’s standing examples of the price of unreadiness. On 5 July 1950, near Osan in South Korea, Task Force Smith, about 540 men of the 24th Infantry Division sent from occupation duty in Japan with few antitank weapons that worked against the T-34, was overrun in a day. In 1986 the University Press of Kansas published America’s First Battles, 1776–1965, edited by Charles E. Heller and William A. Stofft, a collection of essays by Army historians on the first major engagement of each American war; Martin Blumenson’s chapter on Kasserine stood beside Roy K. Flint’s on Task Force Smith. In the early 1990s the Army’s chief of staff, Gen. Gordon R. Sullivan, made “No more Task Force Smiths” the slogan of his readiness effort (Army, January 1992). Kasserine is the older case of the same lesson: courage does not make up for unreadiness.

Sources: Heller and Stofft, eds., America’s First Battles (1986); Wiersema, SAMS monograph (1997), citing Sullivan

Read more: Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

Lessons the Army learnedHow did Kasserine connect to D-Day?

Directly, through its men. Eisenhower was Supreme Commander. Bradley, who had come to Tunisia as an observer, commanded the U.S. First Army on D-Day. The 1st Infantry Division, whose 16th Infantry had held Djebel el Hamra, led the assault at Omaha Beach, and Theodore Roosevelt Jr., Terry Allen’s assistant division commander in Tunisia, landed with the first wave of the 4th Division at Utah Beach and won the Medal of Honor. The 9th Division, which had sent its artillery to Thala, helped take Cherbourg. Harmon, who had reported on Fredendall, led the 2nd Armored Division in the Ardennes in December 1944, and Patton came to France with the Third Army. The habits learned in Tunisia, massing artillery, fighting divisions as divisions, keeping commanders forward and working with tactical air forces, were not invented in Normandy. They had been paid for in the hills of Tunisia (Howe; ABMC).

Sources: Howe, ch. XXXV; ABMC; Wikipedia biographies cited in Chapter 8

Read more: Chapter 8: Patton, El Guettar and Victory

14

Visiting the battlefields and Carthage today

What can be seen, and the travel advisory for the mountains around the pass

Sites of the Tunisian campaign: what to see and how
SiteWhereNotes
North Africa American Cemetery553 Rue Roosevelt, Carthage2,841 burials; 3,724 names of the missing; free; the essential first stop
Medjez-el-Bab War CemeteryAbout 60 km west of Tunis2,903 Commonwealth burials and commemorations
German war cemetery, Bordj CédriaAbout 25 km southeast of Tunis8,562 German dead
Kasserine Pass and Sbiba Gap MonumentWest of Kasserine, off Route 17Small stone of 2006; check current travel advice
Kasserine Pass and road forkWest of KasserineView from the road only; both mountains are Level 4 areas (advisory of 23 Oct 2024)
Sbeitla and Roman SufetulaAbout 24 miles east of KasserineThe most accessible site in central Tunisia
ThalaAbout 35 miles north of the passNo battle memorial recorded; open country
Mareth MuseumBetween Gabès and MédenineThe Mareth Line and the battle of March 1943

Sources: ABMC (2024); CWGC; Volksbund; U.S. Department of State, Tunisia Travel Advisory (23 October 2024); Armchair General (2010). Travel conditions change; check current advice before any trip. See Chapter 9.

Visiting the battlefields and Carthage todayCan you visit the Kasserine Pass today?

Only with great care, and not the mountains. The pass lies a few miles west of the modern city of Kasserine, a provincial capital of about 116,000 people (2022), where Route 13 from Sbeitla meets Route 17; the road still runs up the Oued Hatab valley and forks for Thala and Tébessa. Since 2012 the mountains on both sides have been the scene of Tunisian military operations against armed groups. The U.S. State Department’s travel advisory for Tunisia dated 23 October 2024, the one current when the chapters were written, rates the country as a whole at Level 2, “Exercise Increased Caution,” but lists as Level 4, “Do Not Travel,” Mount Chaambi National Park and the Kasserine mountains of Mount Salloum, Mount Sammamma and Mount Mghila, which include both walls of the pass, together with the zone within 16 km of the Algerian border. Check the current advisory before any trip, view the ground from the road, and travel with a reputable local guide.

Sources: U.S. Department of State, Tunisia Travel Advisory (23 October 2024); Armchair General (2010)

Read more: Chapter 5: The Pass · Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

Visiting the battlefields and Carthage todayIs there a monument at Kasserine?

One, and it is modest. The Kasserine Pass and Sbiba Gap Monument is a small stone west of Kasserine, reached by a dirt track off Route 17 about half a mile before the roundabout, with a clear view of the pass. Its inscription reads “Kasserine Pass and Sbiba Gap Monument, 19-22 February 1943. In Honor Of all Those Who Fought for Freedom.” It was put up in 2006, and a visitor who wrote about it in 2010 could not find out who had erected it (Armchair General, 2010). U.S. Army Africa photographed it during its staff ride of May 2010. Thala has no battle memorial recorded in the sources used here, and the ridges south of the town are open country. At El Guettar, staff-ride parties have found foxholes from March 1943 still visible in the hillsides. Read with Howe’s maps, the ground itself is the real monument.

Sources: Armchair General, “A Journey to World War II Battlefields, Part 2: Kasserine Pass” (2010); army.mil (2010)

Read more: Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory · Chapter 5: The Pass

Visiting the battlefields and Carthage todayWhat is the North Africa American Cemetery at Carthage?

It is the only American military cemetery in Africa, on 27 acres near the site of Roman Carthage, about ten miles northeast of central Tunis, at 553 Rue Roosevelt. It was established in 1948 to gather the temporary American cemeteries of North Africa, on land granted by Tunisia free of charge and taxation, was dedicated on 21 July 1960, and is maintained by the American Battle Monuments Commission. The ABMC gives 2,841 burials; its brochure counts 2,833 headstones, 240 of them marking unknowns, and four pairs of brothers. The Tablets of the Missing, a wall 364 feet long, carry 3,724 names, with rosettes for men since recovered and identified. A chapel and an open-air map room trace the campaign in mosaic. Pvt. Nicholas Minue, Medal of Honor, lies in Plot E, Row 8, Grave 4. Admission is free, and staff give guided tours on request when they can (ABMC brochure, 2024).

Sources: American Battle Monuments Commission, North Africa American Cemetery and Memorial brochure (2024)

Read more: Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

Visiting the battlefields and Carthage todayWhat else can a visitor see?

Base in Tunis and begin at Carthage. Day trips reach the Commonwealth War Graves Commission’s Medjez-el-Bab War Cemetery, about 60 km west of Tunis, with 2,903 burials and commemorations and a memorial to almost 2,000 men of the First and Eighth Armies with no known grave; the German war cemetery at Bordj Cédria, about 25 km southeast of Tunis; the battlefields of Longstop Hill and the Medjez valley; and Enfidaville and Takrouna. In central Tunisia, Sbeitla, with the Roman ruins of Sufetula and its three forum temples, is the easiest and most rewarding stop, about four hours by road from Tunis. El Guettar, east of Gafsa, has been visited by staff rides, and the Mareth Museum, between Gabès and Médenine, shows the Mareth Line. Fériana, the Thelepte airfields and Tébessa lie near or across the Algerian border, partly inside the State Department’s 16 km zone (CWGC; Volksbund; Chapter 9).

Sources: CWGC via ww2cemeteries.com; Volksbund; U.S. Department of State (2024); Wikipedia, “Sbeitla” and “Mareth Museum”

Read more: Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory · Chapter 4: The Long Retreat

Visiting the battlefields and Carthage todayWhat happened to the German dead of Tunisia?

After the war the German War Graves Commission (Volksbund Deutsche Kriegsgräberfürsorge) gathered the German dead of the campaign from provisional cemeteries at Bizerte, Mateur, Sfax and elsewhere, and from field graves across Tunisia, into a single war cemetery at Bordj Cédria, about 25 km southeast of Tunis. Built in 1973–75 and opened to the public on 28 September 1977, it holds 8,562 German dead in ossuaries set in six courtyards cut into a hillside and commemorates 104 more whose graves were never found (Volksbund). In February 1943 American burial parties in the reoccupied pass buried German and Italian dead as well as their own; a Signal Corps photograph of 26 February shows Sgt. T. B. Haber of New York City beside the graves of two German soldiers buried by Americans. The Commonwealth dead lie in the CWGC cemeteries, the largest at Medjez-el-Bab (Volksbund; CWGC).

Sources: Volksbund Deutsche Kriegsgräberfürsorge, Bordj Cédria; U.S. Army Signal Corps photo SC 170126; CWGC

Read more: Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

15

Tracing a Kasserine veteran

Personnel files, the 1973 fire, morning reports, prisoner records, unit histories and graves

  1. Family papersDischarge form, letters, photos and clippings: find the unit and company.
  2. Personnel fileRequest it from the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis; it may have burned in 1973.
  3. DatabasesSearch the National Archives’ AAD for enlistment and prisoner-of-war records.
  4. Morning reportsRead the company’s daily reports for the weeks after the action.
  5. Unit and gravesAfter-action reports (RG 407), division associations, ABMC and the IDPF.
Tracing a Kasserine veteranHow do I start researching a relative who fought at Kasserine?

Start with what the family has: discharge papers (for Army enlisted men, usually the WD AGO Form 53-55), letters, photographs, medals and newspaper clippings, which often name the unit. The unit is the key, because most surviving Army records are filed by unit, not by name. Then request the official personnel file from the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis; files of service members separated more than 62 years ago are archival and open to anyone for a copying fee, and next of kin can request them as well. Search the National Archives’ Access to Archival Databases (AAD) for the World War II Army enlistment records and, for a prisoner, the World War II prisoners of war data file. Then turn to morning reports, unit records and the division associations named in the chapters. If he served in the 1st Armored, 1st, 9th or 34th Infantry Divisions or the 19th Engineers, the chapters show where his unit was day by day (National Archives).

Sources: National Archives, National Personnel Records Center; National Archives, Access to Archival Databases

Read more: Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory · Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid

Tracing a Kasserine veteranWere the records lost in the 1973 fire?

Many were. On 12 July 1973 a fire at the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis destroyed about 16 to 18 million Official Military Personnel Files, including an estimated 80 percent of the files of Army personnel discharged between 1 November 1912 and 1 January 1960, the period that covers almost every Army veteran of Kasserine. No duplicates, microfilm or indexes existed. About 6.5 million burned and water-damaged files were recovered, so a request is still worth making (National Archives). When a file is lost, the center reconstructs the basic facts of service from other records: about 19 million final pay vouchers, some 7.8 million hospital and treatment admission records of the Army Surgeon General’s Office, Veterans Administration claim files, Selective Service records and unit records, among them the morning reports, which had been removed from the building before the fire and proved especially important (National Archives).

Sources: National Archives, “The 1973 Fire, National Personnel Records Center”; National Archives at St. Louis, “Other Records”

Read more: Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

Tracing a Kasserine veteranWhat are morning reports, and why do they matter for Kasserine?

Morning reports were the daily personnel reports of every Army company, battery and troop: who joined or left, who was wounded, killed, missing, captured, sent to hospital or returned to duty, with dates and often places. The National Personnel Records Center holds the Army’s morning reports from November 1912 on microfilm; they survived the 1973 fire, and an index is available through the National Archives catalog (National Archives). They are arranged by unit and date, not by name, so you need the company and the approximate date. For Kasserine they are especially valuable and especially imperfect. Reports written in retreat were often incomplete, and many men first listed as missing walked back days later or were confirmed as prisoners only when Red Cross lists arrived weeks afterward (Chapter 9). Read the reports of the company for several weeks after the date of the action.

Sources: National Archives at St. Louis, “Other Records”; Chapter 9, from Howe and Wiltse

Read more: Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory · Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid

Tracing a Kasserine veteranHow do I learn about a relative who was a prisoner of war?

Many Americans captured at Sidi Bou Zid and Kasserine spent more than two years in captivity. The National Archives’ World War II prisoners of war data file, searchable online through its Access to Archival Databases, lists American prisoners with service number, unit, date of report and, often, camp. Captured officers went first to Italian camps and, from June 1943, to Oflag 64 at Szubin (Schubin) in occupied Poland, the camp set aside for American ground-force officers, whose first inmates had been taken in Tunisia; its column was marched west to Hammelburg in January–March 1945. Enlisted men went to Stalags in Germany, most of them to work. Camp associations and published memoirs, such as those of the Oflag 64 men, fill in the rest. The International Committee of the Red Cross in Geneva, which passed prisoner lists to families during the war, also answers requests about persons detained in the Second World War (National Archives; ICRC).

Sources: National Archives, Access to Archival Databases; International Committee of the Red Cross; Wikipedia, “Oflag 64”

Read more: Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory · Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid

Tracing a Kasserine veteranWhere are the unit records and histories?

The operational records of Army units in the Second World War, including after-action reports, unit journals and histories, are at the National Archives at College Park, Maryland, among the records of the Adjutant General’s Office (Record Group 407). George F. Howe’s official history, Northwest Africa: Seizing the Initiative in the West (1957), is free online and cites the unit reports by name in its notes, which helps in finding them. Unit associations and museums hold much more: the 34th Infantry Division Association for the 168th, 133rd and 135th Infantry; the First Division Museum at Cantigny for the 1st Infantry Division; the 9th Infantry Division association, which publishes its artillery’s march to Thala and its roll of Distinguished Service Crosses; and the descendants’ association of the World War II Ranger battalions. Signal Corps photographs, many dated and captioned by place, are at the National Archives (Howe; the chapters’ sources).

Sources: National Archives at College Park (RG 407); Howe (1957); unit associations cited in Chapters 2, 3, 5 and 6

Read more: Chapter 5: The Pass · Chapter 3: Sidi Bou Zid · Chapter 2: Faïd, Sened and the Eastern Dorsal

Tracing a Kasserine veteranHow do I find a relative who died in Tunisia?

First learn whether he was brought home. Under the Return of the Dead program, which ran until 1951, more than 60 percent of American families chose repatriation, so most of the American dead of Kasserine lie in cemeteries across the United States (National WWII Museum). Those who stayed overseas, and the missing, are in the American Battle Monuments Commission’s online database, which gives plot, row and grave at the North Africa American Cemetery at Carthage or the name on the Tablets of the Missing. The Individual Deceased Personnel File (IDPF) made for each dead soldier records the circumstances of death, burial, identification and the family’s choice; these files were not personnel files and were not lost in the 1973 fire, and they are held partly by the National Archives at St. Louis and partly by the Army’s Human Resources Command at Fort Knox. Check the National Archives catalog first, since some have been digitized (ABMC; National Archives).

Sources: American Battle Monuments Commission; National WWII Museum, “The Graves Registration Service in World War II”; National Archives

Read more: Chapter 9: The Cost and the Memory

No questions match that search. Try another word, or return to the collection.

In the photographs

The ground and the people the answers describe

American medium tanks lined up in a dry riverbed as a defensive line in the Kasserine sector
Tanks of the 2nd Battalion, 13th Armored Regiment, lined up in a dry riverbed as a front line of defense, Kasserine sector, 22 February 1943, the day the offensive stalled. U.S. Army Signal Corps photo SC 170093, National Archives; public domain.
Rows of white headstones at the North Africa American Cemetery in Carthage
Headstones at the North Africa American Cemetery, Carthage, May 2024. Maj. Joe Legros, U.S. Army (DVIDS); public domain.
A German Tiger I heavy tank in Tunisia
A Tiger I in Tunisia, January 1943; unit uncertain, probably s.Pz.Abt. 501. German propaganda company photograph by Helmuth Pirath. Bundesarchiv, Bild 101I-554-0872-35, CC BY-SA 3.0 DE.
The small stone Kasserine Pass and Sbiba Gap monument on open ground west of Kasserine
The Kasserine Pass and Sbiba Gap Monument, May 2010. Rick Scavetta, U.S. Army Africa, CC BY 2.0.
A burned-out German Panzer IV tank in the Kasserine area
A Panzer IV knocked out by American artillery in the Kasserine area, photographed 26 February 1943. U.S. Army Signal Corps photo SC 170099; public domain.
Jewish men conscripted for forced labor marched through a street in Tunis
Jewish forced laborers marched through Tunis, December 1942. German propaganda photograph (Lüken); its caption’s claims about the onlookers served the occupiers. Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-J20384, CC BY-SA 3.0 DE.
Spitfire fighters parked on an airfield at Tébessa
Spitfires of the U.S. 31st Fighter Group at Tébessa, 18 February 1943, the day after they were flown out of Thelepte. U.S. Army Signal Corps photo SC 170026; public domain.
Read the chapters

The whole story, in nine chapters

Each chapter is a full account of one part of the campaign, with maps, charts, photographs, the people involved and its sources. Or start at the collection page with the atlas and the timeline.

All nine chapters, the atlas and the timeline are gathered on the collection page.

← Back to the Kasserine Pass collection
Sources

Where these answers come from

  • George F. Howe, Northwest Africa: Seizing the Initiative in the West, United States Army in World War II (Office of the Chief of Military History, 1957), with its notes on the unit reports and German war diaries.
  • Martin Blumenson, Kasserine Pass (Houghton Mifflin, 1967), and “Kasserine Pass, 30 January–22 February 1943,” in Charles E. Heller and William A. Stofft, eds., America’s First Battles, 1776–1965 (University Press of Kansas, 1986).
  • I. S. O. Playfair et al., The Mediterranean and Middle East, vol. IV, The Destruction of the Axis Forces in Africa (HMSO, 1966); Charles R. Anderson, Tunisia, 17 November 1942–13 May 1943 (CMH, 1993).
  • Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate, eds., The Army Air Forces in World War II, vol. 2 (University of Chicago Press, 1949); Daniel R. Mortensen, ed., Airpower and Ground Armies (Air University Press, 1998); War Department, FM 100-5 (1941) and FM 100-20 (1943).
  • Charles M. Wiltse, Medical Service in the Mediterranean and Minor Theaters (OCMH, 1965); Daniel L. Haulman, A Tuskegee Airmen Chronology (AFHRA, 2016); Michael J. King, Rangers (Combat Studies Institute, 1985).
  • Rick Atkinson, An Army at Dawn (Henry Holt, 2002); Orr Kelly, Meeting the Fox (Wiley, 2002); Bruce Allen Watson, Exit Rommel (Stackpole, 2007); Steven J. Zaloga, Kasserine Pass 1943 (Osprey, 2005); Carlo D’Este, Patton: A Genius for War (1995).
  • Omar N. Bradley, A Soldier’s Story (1951); Dwight D. Eisenhower, Crusade in Europe (1948); B. H. Liddell Hart, ed., The Rommel Papers (1953); Ernie Pyle, Here Is Your War (1943); Mark T. Calhoun, National WWII Museum (2023).
  • Yad Vashem, “The Jews of Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia”; United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, “Labor and Internment Camps in North Africa”; Robert Satloff, Among the Righteous (2006); Montreal Holocaust Museum; Harif (2022).
  • American Battle Monuments Commission, North Africa American Cemetery and Memorial (brochure, 2024); Commonwealth War Graves Commission; Volksbund Deutsche Kriegsgräberfürsorge; U.S. Department of State, Tunisia Travel Advisory (23 October 2024); Armchair General (2010).
  • National Archives: National Personnel Records Center, “The 1973 Fire” and “Other Records” (morning reports, final pay vouchers, hospital admission records); Access to Archival Databases (World War II Army enlistment records and prisoners of war data file); records of the Adjutant General’s Office, RG 407, College Park; International Committee of the Red Cross.
  • Unit sources: 34th Infantry Division Association; 9th Infantry Division Association; WWII Ranger Battalions Descendants; Rogers, “Colonel Thomas Davisson Drake” (Kriegy Research Group); Newton, World War II magazine (2002); Military Times Hall of Valor and Home of Heroes citations.
  • The nine chapters of this collection, which cite the sources above and many others in detail.

Answers summarize the sources in our own words, with only short quotations, each attributed. Where sources disagree, we say so and give the range; times are those of the records and often differ between accounts. Travel advice, opening hours and records-access rules change; confirm them before you travel or write. Corrections are welcome. Photographs: U.S. Army Signal Corps (U.S. National Archives) and U.S. Army, public domain; Bundesarchiv, CC BY-SA 3.0 DE (German propaganda company photographs, whose captions reflect their purpose); U.S. Army Africa, CC BY 2.0; all via Wikimedia Commons. Charts, maps and markers are original graphics for this collection; positions on the maps are approximate, and badges are illustrations, not official insignia.